» Articles » PMID: 29235055

A Finite Element Model to Assess Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets with Elastomeric Liners

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Dec 14
PMID 29235055
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People with transtibial amputation often experience skin breakdown due to the pressures and shear stresses that occur at the limb-socket interface. The purpose of this research was to create a transtibial finite element model (FEM) of a contemporary prosthesis that included complete socket geometry, two frictional interactions (limb-liner and liner-socket), and an elastomeric liner. Magnetic resonance imaging scans from three people with characteristic transtibial limb shapes (i.e., short-conical, long-conical, and cylindrical) were acquired and used to develop the models. Each model was evaluated with two loading profiles to identify locations of focused stresses during stance phase. The models identified five locations on the participants' residual limbs where peak stresses matched locations of mechanically induced skin issues they experienced in the 9 months prior to being scanned. The peak contact pressure across all simulations was 98 kPa and the maximum resultant shear stress was 50 kPa, showing reasonable agreement with interface stress measurements reported in the literature. Future research could take advantage of the developed FEM to assess the influence of changes in limb volume or liner material properties on interface stress distributions. Graphical abstract Residual limb finite element model. Left: model components. Right: interface pressures during stance phase.

Citing Articles

Comparative biomechanical analysis of a conventional/novel hip prosthetic socket.

Qian Y, Cheng Y, Chen S, Zhang M, Fang Y, Zhang T Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 63(2):417-428.

PMID: 39361102 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03206-9.


Bioinspired Design of 3D-Printed Cellular Metamaterial Prosthetic Liners for Enhanced Comfort and Stability.

Plesec V, Harih G Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(9).

PMID: 39329562 PMC: 11430568. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9090540.


An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.

Sanders J, Vamos A, Mertens J, Allyn K, Larsen B, Ballesteros D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11168.

PMID: 38750086 PMC: 11096356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9.


Assessment of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials for prosthetic liners.

Devin K, Tang J, Hamilton A, Moser D, Jiang L Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2024; 238(3):348-357.

PMID: 38279687 PMC: 10941651. DOI: 10.1177/09544119231225529.


Validation of a Custom Interface Pressure Measurement System to Improve Fitting of Transtibial Prosthetic Check Sockets.

Armitage L, Cho K, Sariyildiz E, Buller A, OBrien S, Kark L Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050838 PMC: 10099032. DOI: 10.3390/s23073778.


References
1.
Tadepalli S, Erdemir A, Cavanagh P . Comparison of hexahedral and tetrahedral elements in finite element analysis of the foot and footwear. J Biomech. 2011; 44(12):2337-43. PMC: 7458432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.006. View

2.
Portnoy S, Siev-Ner I, Yizhar Z, Kristal A, Shabshin N, Gefen A . Surgical and morphological factors that affect internal mechanical loads in soft tissues of the transtibial residuum. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009; 37(12):2583-605. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9801-3. View

3.
Sanders J, McLean J, Cagle J, Gardner D, Allyn K . Technical note: Computer-manufactured inserts for prosthetic sockets. Med Eng Phys. 2016; 38(8):801-6. PMC: 4931975. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.04.019. View

4.
Goldstein B, Sanders J . Skin response to repetitive mechanical stress: a new experimental model in pig. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79(3):265-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90005-3. View

5.
Oomens C, Loerakker S, Bader D . The importance of internal strain as opposed to interface pressure in the prevention of pressure related deep tissue injury. J Tissue Viability. 2009; 19(2):35-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.11.002. View