» Articles » PMID: 28310228

Optimal Foraging and Growth in Bluegills

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28310228
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two models of foraging behaviour (optimal prey selection and random prey selection) were used to calculate the potential net energy intake of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) in a small Michigan lake. These predictions were then compared to the actual growth exhibited by bluegills in the lake. Predictions of net energy gain derived from optimal foraging criteria were significantly correlated with the seasonal gain in mass by the fish; both energy gain and growth were positively related to bluegill length. Predictions of net energy intake based upon non-selective foraging (i.e. prey eaten as encountered) were not significantly correlated with bluegill growth. Comparing the net energy intake of bluegills feeding optimally versus non-selectively demonstrates that optimal prey selection increases average energy gain by 4 to 10 fold. This result illustrates the strong evolutionary advantage afforded to foragers that maximize net energy intake in a natural environment. Finally, the potential usefulness of optimal foraging models to the study of species and/or size-class interactions is discussed and a heuristic example pertaining to the development of "stunted" populations in fishes is provided.

Citing Articles

The paradox of plant preference: The malaria vectors and select suboptimal food sources for their survival and reproduction.

Pare P, Hien D, Youba M, Yerbanga R, Cohuet A, Gouagna L Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(3):e11187.

PMID: 38533352 PMC: 10963300. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11187.


Effects of life history and individual development on community dynamics: A review of counterintuitive consequences.

Roos A Ecol Res. 2020; 35(6):930-946.

PMID: 33380774 PMC: 7756606. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.12174.


The effects of temperature on the proxies of visual detection of larvae: observations from the optic tectum.

Babkiewicz E, Bazala M, Urban P, Maszczyk P, Markowska M, Gliwicz Z Biol Open. 2020; 9(7).

PMID: 32694151 PMC: 7390641. DOI: 10.1242/bio.047779.


Size-selective predation by roach (Rutilus rutilus) on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha): field stuides.

Prejs A, Lewandowski K, Stanczykowska-Piotrowska A Oecologia. 2017; 83(3):378-384.

PMID: 28313010 DOI: 10.1007/BF00317563.


Foraging and predator avoidance: a test of a patch choice model with juvenile bluegill sunfish.

Gotceitas V Oecologia. 2017; 83(3):346-351.

PMID: 28313005 DOI: 10.1007/BF00317558.


References
1.
Gould S, Lewontin R . The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979; 205(1161):581-98. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. View

2.
Belovsky G . Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol. 1978; 14(1):105-34. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90007-2. View

3.
Lewontin R . Sociobiology as an adaptationist program. Behav Sci. 1979; 24(1):5-14. DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830240103. View

4.
Charnov E . Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 1976; 9(2):129-36. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x. View

5.
Oaten A . Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. Theor Popul Biol. 1977; 12(3):263-85. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90046-6. View