» Articles » PMID: 23419635

Economic Considerations for Social Distancing and Behavioral Based Policies During an Epidemic

Overview
Journal J Health Econ
Specialty Health Services
Date 2013 Feb 20
PMID 23419635
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Public policies intended to induce behavioral change, specifically incentives to reduce interpersonal contacts or to "social distance," increasingly play a prominent role in public disease response strategies as governments plan for and respond to major epidemics. I compare social distancing incentives and outcomes under decentralized, full control social planner, and constrained social planner, without health class specific control, decision making scenarios. Constrained social planner decision making, based on non-health class specific controls, can in some instances make society worse off than decentralized decision making (i.e. no intervention). The oft neglected behavior of recovered and immune individuals is important for welfare and health outcomes.

Citing Articles

Beyond six feet: The collective behavior of social distancing.

Wu Z PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0293489.

PMID: 39269926 PMC: 11398703. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293489.


Economic Epidemiology: A Framework to Study Interactions of Epidemics and the Economy.

Goenka A, Liu L Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024; 22(6):767-769.

PMID: 39141026 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00907-y.


Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries.

Chai D, El Mossadeq L, Raymond M, Courtier-Orgogozo V PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0289998.

PMID: 38100502 PMC: 10723704. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289998.


The impact of threshold decision mechanisms of collective behavior on disease spread.

Morsky B, Magpantay F, Day T, Akcay E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(19):e2221479120.

PMID: 37126702 PMC: 10175758. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2221479120.


Satisfaction with pandemic management and compliance with public health measures: Evidence from a German household survey on the COVID-19 crisis.

Jaschke P, Keita S, Vallizadeh E, Kuhne S PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281893.

PMID: 36809381 PMC: 9942998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281893.


References
1.
Auld M . Choices, beliefs, and infectious disease dynamics. J Health Econ. 2003; 22(3):361-77. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00103-0. View

2.
Veliov V . On the effect of population heterogeneity on dynamics of epidemic diseases. J Math Biol. 2005; 51(2):123-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-004-0288-0. View

3.
Fraser C, Donnelly C, Cauchemez S, Hanage W, Van Kerkhove M, Hollingsworth T . Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1): early findings. Science. 2009; 324(5934):1557-61. PMC: 3735127. DOI: 10.1126/science.1176062. View

4.
Begon M, Bennett M, Bowers R, French N, Hazel S, Turner J . A clarification of transmission terms in host-microparasite models: numbers, densities and areas. Epidemiol Infect. 2002; 129(1):147-53. PMC: 2869860. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268802007148. View

5.
Nasell I . Stochastic models of some endemic infections. Math Biosci. 2002; 179(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00098-6. View