Long-standing Influenza Vaccination Policy is in Accord with Individual Self-interest but Not with the Utilitarian Optimum

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2007 Mar 21

PMID 17369367

Citations 104

Authors

Alison P Galvani

Timothy C Reluga

Gretchen B Chapman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Influenza vaccination is vital for reducing infection-mediated morbidity and mortality. To maximize effectiveness, vaccination programs must anticipate the effects of public perceptions and attitudes on voluntary adherence. A vaccine allocation strategy that is optimal for the population is not necessarily optimal for an individual. For epidemic influenza, the elderly have the greatest risk of influenza mortality, yet children are responsible for most of the transmission. The long-standing recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control follow the dictates of individual self-interest and prioritize the elderly for vaccination. However, preferentially vaccinating children may dramatically reduce community-wide influenza transmission. A potential obstacle to this is that the personal utility of vaccination is lower for children than it is for the elderly. We parameterize an epidemiological game-theoretic model of influenza vaccination with questionnaire data on actual perceptions of influenza and its vaccine to compare Nash equilibria vaccination strategies driven by self-interest with utilitarian strategies for both epidemic and pandemic influenza. Our results reveal possible strategies to bring Nash and utilitarian vaccination levels into alignment.

Citing Articles

Investigating the impact of environmental feedback on the optional prisoner's dilemma for insights into cyclic dominance and evolution of cooperation.

Shuvo M, Ariful Kabir K R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):240717.

PMID: 39445094 PMC: 11495962. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240717.

Gender differences in responses to an altruistic message regarding rubella vaccination.

Okuno H, Satoh H, Arai S, Suzuki M, Kikkawa T Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1353091.

PMID: 39185119 PMC: 11341465. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353091.

The majority of Canadians likely behaved as myopic rationalists rather than success-based learners when deciding on their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

Aghaeeyan A, Ramazi P, Lewis M Front Public Health. 2024; 12():1406911.

PMID: 39114515 PMC: 11303299. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406911.

Cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine for older adults in South Korea.

Song Y, Shim E Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2348124.

PMID: 38714332 PMC: 11085998. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2348124.

Simple economics of vaccination: public policies and incentives.

Villota-Miranda J, Rodriguez-Ibeas R Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024; 24(2):155-172.

PMID: 38517588 PMC: 11588956. DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09367-2.

References

Wilde J, McMillan J, Serwint J, Butta J, ORiordan M, Steinhoff M . Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999; 281(10):908-13. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.10.908. View

. Influenza vaccination and self-reported reasons for not receiving influenza vaccination among Medicare beneficiaries aged > or =65 years--United States, 1991-2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004; 53(43):1012-5. View

Viboud C, Bjornstad O, Smith D, Simonsen L, Miller M, Grenfell B . Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science. 2006; 312(5772):447-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.1125237. View

Govaert T, Thijs C, Masurel N, Sprenger M, Dinant G, Knottnerus J . The efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly individuals. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. JAMA. 1994; 272(21):1661-5. View

Neuzil K, Dupont W, Wright P, Edwards K . Efficacy of inactivated and cold-adapted vaccines against influenza A infection, 1985 to 1990: the pediatric experience. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001; 20(8):733-40. DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200108000-00004. View

Brownstein J, Kleinman K, Mandl K . Identifying pediatric age groups for influenza vaccination using a real-time regional surveillance system. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(7):686-93. PMC: 1266301. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi257. View

Asch D, Baron J, Hershey J, Kunreuther H, Meszaros J, Ritov I . Omission bias and pertussis vaccination. Med Decis Making. 1994; 14(2):118-23. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400204. View

Palache A . Influenza vaccines. A reappraisal of their use. Drugs. 1998; 54(6):841-56. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199754060-00004. View

Nichol K, Lind A, Margolis K, Murdoch M, McFadden R, Hauge M . The effectiveness of vaccination against influenza in healthy, working adults. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333(14):889-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199510053331401. View

10.

Taber L, Paredes A, Glezen W, Couch R . Infection with influenza A/Victoria virus in Houston families, 1976. J Hyg (Lond). 1981; 86(3):303-13. PMC: 2133985. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400069059. View

11.

Brewer N, Chapman G, Gibbons F, Gerrard M, McCaul K, Weinstein N . Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26(2):136-45. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136. View

12.

Chapman G, Coups E . Emotions and preventive health behavior: worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health Psychol. 2006; 25(1):82-90. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.82. View

13.

Simonsen L, Clarke M, Schonberger L, Arden N, Cox N, Fukuda K . Pandemic versus epidemic influenza mortality: a pattern of changing age distribution. J Infect Dis. 1998; 178(1):53-60. DOI: 10.1086/515616. View

14.

Fox J, Hall C, COONEY M, Foy H . Influenzavirus infections in Seattle families, 1975-1979. I. Study design, methods and the occurrence of infections by time and age. Am J Epidemiol. 1982; 116(2):212-27. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113407. View

15.

Lasky T, Terracciano G, Magder L, Koski C, Ballesteros M, Nash D . The Guillain-Barré syndrome and the 1992-1993 and 1993-1994 influenza vaccines. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(25):1797-802. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199812173392501. View

16.

Campbell D, Rumley M . Cost-effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in a healthy, working-age population. J Occup Environ Med. 1997; 39(5):408-14. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199705000-00006. View

17.

Simonsen L, Clarke M, Williamson G, Stroup D, Arden N, Schonberger L . The impact of influenza epidemics on mortality: introducing a severity index. Am J Public Health. 1998; 87(12):1944-50. PMC: 1381234. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.1944. View

18.

Kavet J . A perspective on the significance of pandemic influenza. Am J Public Health. 1977; 67(11):1063-70. PMC: 1653750. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.67.11.1063. View

19.

Bauch C, Galvani A, Earn D . Group interest versus self-interest in smallpox vaccination policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(18):10564-7. PMC: 193525. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1731324100. View

20.

Smith N, Bresee J, Shay D, Uyeki T, Cox N, Strikas R . Prevention and Control of Influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006; 55(RR-10):1-42. View