» Articles » PMID: 36570032

The Bright and Dark Sides of Social Media Usage During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Evidence from Japan

Overview
Date 2022 Dec 26
PMID 36570032
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spread of misinformation on the internet regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, such as unproven or fake cures, has been a serious concern. However, the extent to which social media usage affects individuals' health behavior, particularly when reliable information is scarce, is not well understood. This study evaluates the impact of social media usage on individuals' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as demand for necessities and social distancing. We conduct an original online survey of 1804 Japanese respondents in March 2020. Japan is suitable because it confirmed COVID-19 cases earlier than most other countries. Scientific evidence about the coronavirus and protective measures was scarce in the initial pandemic phase, despite the spread of unconfirmed rumors. Our analysis focuses on the usage of Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. We use the entropy balancing method to control for heterogeneity in observed characteristics between social media users and non-users. The results show that while users are more likely to maintain social distancing practices, they are also more likely to take measures whose reliability is not scientifically confirmed, such as eating fermented soybeans. Although previous studies emphasize the negative effects of social media, our results suggest that it has both bright and dark sides.

Citing Articles

The relationship between self-control and internet gaming disorder and problematic social networking site use: the mediation effects of internet use motives.

Zhou R, Morita N, Zhu C, Ogai Y, Saito T, Yang W Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1369973.

PMID: 39391081 PMC: 11464309. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369973.


Vaccine Hesitancy and Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Misinformation in Japanese Youth: The Contribution of Personality Traits and National Identity.

Rivers D, Unser-Schutz G, Rudolph N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(1).

PMID: 38248507 PMC: 10815417. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010042.


Infodemic: Challenges and solutions in topic discovery and data process.

Zhang J, Pan Y, Lin H, Sun Z, Wu P, Tu J Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):166.

PMID: 37679764 PMC: 10483774. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01179-z.


Structural equation modeling of direct and indirect associations of social media addiction with eating behavior in adolescents and young adults.

Mohsenpour M, Karamizadeh M, Barati-Boldaji R, Ferns G, Akbarzadeh M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3044.

PMID: 36810365 PMC: 9942059. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29961-7.


The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19.

Mohammed F, Al-Kumaim N, Alzahrani A, Fazea Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767142 PMC: 9914293. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031775.


References
1.
Huynh T . Does culture matter social distancing under the COVID-19 pandemic?. Saf Sci. 2020; 130:104872. PMC: 7284251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104872. View

2.
Fenichel E . Economic considerations for social distancing and behavioral based policies during an epidemic. J Health Econ. 2013; 32(2):440-51. PMC: 3659402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.01.002. View

3.
OConnell K, Berluti K, Rhoads S, Marsh A . Reduced social distancing early in the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with antisocial behaviors in an online United States sample. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0244974. PMC: 7790541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244974. View

4.
Li H, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J . YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(5). PMC: 7228483. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604. View

5.
Rhee M, Sissoko M, Perry S, McFarland W, Parsonnet J, Doumbo O . Use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) following a malaria education intervention in Piron, Mali: a control trial with systematic allocation of households. Malar J. 2005; 4:35. PMC: 1208942. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-4-35. View