» Articles » PMID: 2341844

Disturbances in Human Arm Movement Trajectory Due to Mild Cerebellar Dysfunction

Overview
Date 1990 Apr 1
PMID 2341844
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The temporal structure of arm movements was studied in nine cerebellar patients with mild impairment of the upper limbs and in six age-matched control subjects. The experimental paradigm consisted of visually guided, step tracking movements about the elbow. Movements ranged from 10 degrees to 70 degrees in amplitude and were made under different instructions (fast, fast/accurate, accurate). As in normal subjects, cerebellar patients were able to scale peak velocity with movement amplitude. This relationship was highly linear under all instruction conditions. Similar relationships existed between movement duration and amplitude. In contrast to normal subjects who produced movements with nearly symmetric velocity profiles, movements made by cerebellar patients were characterised by short acceleration and long deceleration durations. The degree of asymmetry was directly related to movement duration but was unaffected by movement peak velocity. Acceleration durations did not increase beyond 300 ms even in movements lasting up to 1s. These findings demonstrate that, despite little or no obvious impairment of the limb during routine examination, the temporal structure of voluntary movements in cerebellar patients is clearly disturbed. This supports the view that the production of an optimal movement trajectory is under cerebellar influence.

Citing Articles

Sensitivity of Cerebellar Reaching Ataxia to Kinematic and Dynamic Demands.

Oh K, Cao D, Cowan N, Cowan N, Bastian A, Bastian A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39554081 PMC: 11565890. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.28.620711.


A first investigation of tongue, lip, and jaw movements in persons with dysarthria due to multiple sclerosis.

Mefferd A, Lai A, Bagnato F Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018; 27:188-194.

PMID: 30399501 PMC: 6333529. DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.116.


Why Don't We Move Slower? The Value of Time in the Neural Control of Action.

Berret B, Jean F J Neurosci. 2016; 36(4):1056-70.

PMID: 26818497 PMC: 6604817. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1921-15.2016.


Long-latency reflexes account for limb biomechanics through several supraspinal pathways.

Kurtzer I Front Integr Neurosci. 2015; 8:99.

PMID: 25688187 PMC: 4310276. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00099.


Temporal disruption of upper-limb anticipatory postural adjustments in cerebellar ataxic patients.

Bruttini C, Esposti R, Bolzoni F, Vanotti A, Mariotti C, Cavallari P Exp Brain Res. 2014; 233(1):197-203.

PMID: 25245658 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4103-x.


References
1.
Braitenberg V . Is the cerebellar cortex a biological clock in the millisecond range?. Prog Brain Res. 1967; 25:334-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60971-1. View

2.
Cooke J, Brown S, Cunningham D . Kinematics of arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging. 1989; 10(2):159-65. DOI: 10.1016/0197-4580(89)90025-0. View

3.
BROOKS V, Kozlovskaya I, ATKIN A, HORVATH F, Uno M . Effects of cooling dentate nucleus on tracking-task performance in monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1973; 36(6):974-95. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.6.974. View

4.
Bouisset S, Lestienne F . The organisation of a simple voluntary movement as analysed from its kinematic properties. Brain Res. 1974; 71(2-3):451-7. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90988-3. View

5.
Hallett M, Shahani B, YOUNG R . EMG analysis of patients with cerebellar deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975; 38(12):1163-9. PMC: 492182. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.38.12.1163. View