» Articles » PMID: 512949

Ballistic Flexion Movements of the Human Thumb

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1979 Sep 1
PMID 512949
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. In response to an auditory stimulus normal subjects made ballistic flexion movements of the top joint of the thumb against a lever attached to the spindle of a low-inertia electric motor. 2. Electromyographic (e.m.g.) activity was recorded from pairs of fine wire electrodes inserted into flexor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis longus, respectively the sole flexor and extensor of the joint. 3. Movements of 5 degrees, 10 degrees and 20 degrees were made from initial angles of 10 degrees, 20 degrees and 30 degrees flexion against torques of 0.04, 0.08 and 0.16 Nm. 4. The e.m.g. activity initiating such movements was characterized by a 'triphasic' pattern of sequential bursts of activity in the agonist (flexor pollicis longus), then in the antagonist (extensor pollicis longus), and then in the agonist again. 5. The duration of the first agonist and first antagonist bursts ranged from about 50 to 90 ms and there was no significant change of burst length in the different mechanical conditions. 6. In movements of differing angular distance, the rectified and integrated e.m.g. activity of the first agonist burst could be correlated with the distance moved. The rectified and integrated e.m.g. activity of the first antagonist burst could not be correlated with the distance moved. 7. Responses of the muscles to perturbations either before or during the ballistic movements were studied. Current in the motor could be altered so to extend the thumb ('stretch'), to allow it to accelerate ('release'), or to prevent further movement ('halt'). 8. Suitably timed stretch increased the e.m.g. activity of the first agonist burst while release decreased it. 9. There was a small response of the agonist to stretch or halt timed to act during the interval between the first two agonist bursts; the major response was an augmentation of the second agonist burst. 10. Stretch, timed to act between the first two agonist bursts which released the antagonist, diminished the activity of the first antagonist burst while halt virtually eradicated it in all but one subject. Release, at this time, which stretched the antagonist, increased the activity of the first antagonist burst. 11. It is concluded that the individual components of a ballistic movement are relatively fixed in duration and the amount of e.m.g. activity is altered within this time interval to produce the different forces required for fast movements of different amplitude. 12. Both agonist and antagonist muscles remain under some feed-back control during the entire course of a ballistic movement, but the amount of influence of fedd-back depends on the supraspinal command signal and the changes in the spindle during the course of the movement.

Citing Articles

Why so slow? Models of parkinsonian bradykinesia.

Williams D Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024; 25(8):573-586.

PMID: 38937655 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00830-0.


The effect of initiation prediction and non-prediction on muscle relaxation control.

Matsumoto H, Takenaka Y, Suzuki T, Sugawara K J Phys Ther Sci. 2023; 35(4):293-299.

PMID: 37020829 PMC: 10067346. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.35.293.


Reaching and Grasping Movements in Parkinson's Disease: A Review.

Fasano A, Mazzoni A, Falotico E J Parkinsons Dis. 2022; 12(4):1083-1113.

PMID: 35253780 PMC: 9198782. DOI: 10.3233/JPD-213082.


Minimum Electromyographic Burst Duration in Healthy Controls: Implications for Electrodiagnosis in Movement Disorders.

Collins A, Brown S, Baker M Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2020; 7(7):827-833.

PMID: 33033737 PMC: 7533965. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13044.


Dysmetria and Errors in Predictions: The Role of Internal Forward Model.

Cabaraux P, Gandini J, Kakei S, Manto M, Mitoma H, Tanaka H Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(18).

PMID: 32962256 PMC: 7555030. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21186900.


References
1.
Adam J, Hallett M, Marsden C, MERTON P, Morton H . Absence of the first component of the long-latency human stretch reflex in a thumb muscle when it is used as an antagonist [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1976; 260(2):67P-68P. View

2.
Desmedt J, Godaux E . Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol. 1977; 264(3):673-93. PMC: 1307786. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011689. View

3.
Ghez C, Vicario D . The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments. Exp Brain Res. 1978; 33(2):191-202. DOI: 10.1007/BF00238059. View

4.
Freund H, Budingen H . The relationship between speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contractions of human arm muscles. Exp Brain Res. 1978; 31(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00235800. View

5.
Angel R . Antagonist muscle activity during rapid arm movements: central versus proprioceptive influences. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1977; 40(7):683-6. PMC: 492801. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.40.7.683. View