» Articles » PMID: 6842287

Effects of Perturbations on Accuracy of Arm Movements

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1983 May 1
PMID 6842287
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of perturbation-induced disruption of active movement depends upon the size of the active movement, with small movements being more disrupted than large ones. Human subjects performed pronating or supinating arm movements of 3 degrees, 10 degrees, and 30 degrees in a discrete visual tracking task. When the movements were briefly stopped or reversed, the resultant errors in trajectory and static position (expressed relative to the movement size) were greater for small as compared to large movements. These findings demonstrate that peripheral kinesthetic disturbances modify movement trajectory and end point error, with small movements being more affected than large movements.

Citing Articles

Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Gaffin-Cahn E, Hudson T, Landy M J Vis. 2019; 19(1):5.

PMID: 30640373 PMC: 6334820. DOI: 10.1167/19.1.5.


Torque response to external perturbation during unconstrained goal-directed arm movements.

Zhang L, Straube A, Eggert T Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(4):1173-84.

PMID: 24477761 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3826-z.


The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement.

Hinder M, Milner T J Physiol. 2003; 549(Pt 3):953-63.

PMID: 12717002 PMC: 2342993. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033845.


Centrally programmed patterns of muscle activity in voluntary motor behavior of humans.

Sanes J, Jennings V Exp Brain Res. 1984; 54(1):23-32.

PMID: 6698146 DOI: 10.1007/BF00235815.


From activity to rest: gating of excitatory autogenetic afferences from the relaxing muscle in man.

Schieppati M, Crenna P Exp Brain Res. 1984; 56(3):448-57.

PMID: 6499972 DOI: 10.1007/BF00237985.