» Articles » PMID: 23411674

Evidence for a Basic Level in a Taxonomy of Everyday Action Sounds

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Feb 16
PMID 23411674
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We searched for evidence that the auditory organization of categories of sounds produced by actions includes a privileged or "basic" level of description. The sound events consisted of single objects (or substances) undergoing simple actions. Performance on sound events was measured in two ways: sounds were directly verified as belonging to a category, or sounds were used to create lexical priming. The category verification experiment measured the accuracy and reaction time to brief excerpts of these sounds. The lexical priming experiment measured reaction time benefits and costs caused by the presentation of these sounds prior to a lexical decision. The level of description of a sound varied in how specifically it described the physical properties of the action producing the sound. Both identification and priming effects were superior when a label described the specific interaction causing the sound (e.g. trickling) in comparison to the following: (1) more general descriptions (e.g. pour, liquid: trickling is a specific manner of pouring liquid), (2) more detailed descriptions using adverbs to provide detail regarding the manner of the action (e.g. trickling evenly). These results are consistent with neuroimaging studies showing that auditory representations of sounds produced by actions familiar to the listener activate motor representations of the gestures involved in sound production.

Citing Articles

Evaluating causes and gestures: source-related and crossmodal features in the perception of environmental sounds.

Lembke S Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1520209.

PMID: 39989628 PMC: 11842436. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1520209.


Human Auditory Ecology: Extending Hearing Research to the Perception of Natural Soundscapes by Humans in Rapidly Changing Environments.

Lorenzi C, Apoux F, Grinfeder E, Krause B, Miller-Viacava N, Sueur J Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231212032.

PMID: 37981813 PMC: 10658775. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231212032.


Early experience with low-pass filtered images facilitates visual category learning in a neural network model.

Jinsi O, Henderson M, Tarr M PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280145.

PMID: 36608003 PMC: 9821476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280145.


What do we mean with sound semantics, exactly? A survey of taxonomies and ontologies of everyday sounds.

Giordano B, de Miranda Azevedo R, Plasencia-Calana Y, Formisano E, Dumontier M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:964209.

PMID: 36312201 PMC: 9601315. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964209.


Perception of Environmental Sounds in Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.

Shafiro V, Luzum N, Moberly A, Harris M Front Neurosci. 2022; 15:788899.

PMID: 35082595 PMC: 8785216. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.788899.


References
1.
Lewis J, Brefczynski J, Phinney R, Janik J, DeYoe E . Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(21):5148-58. PMC: 6724809. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0419-05.2005. View

2.
James T, Stevenson R, Kim S, VanDerKlok R, James K . Shape from sound: evidence for a shape operator in the lateral occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(7):1807-15. PMC: 3100397. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.004. View

3.
Galati G, Committeri G, Spitoni G, Aprile T, DI Russo F, Pitzalis S . A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(3):1274-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.044. View

4.
Cummings A, Ceponiene R, Koyama A, Saygin A, Townsend J, Dick F . Auditory semantic networks for words and natural sounds. Brain Res. 2006; 1115(1):92-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.050. View

5.
Marcell M, Borella D, Greene M, Kerr E, Rogers S . Confrontation naming of environmental sounds. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001; 22(6):830-64. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.22.6.830.949. View