» Articles » PMID: 37981813

Human Auditory Ecology: Extending Hearing Research to the Perception of Natural Soundscapes by Humans in Rapidly Changing Environments

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2023 Nov 20
PMID 37981813
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research in hearing sciences has provided extensive knowledge about how the human auditory system processes speech and assists communication. In contrast, little is known about how this system processes "natural soundscapes," that is the complex arrangements of biological and geophysical sounds shaped by sound propagation through non-anthropogenic habitats [Grinfeder et al. (2022). 894232]. This is surprising given that, for many species, the capacity to process natural soundscapes determines survival and reproduction through the ability to represent and monitor the immediate environment. Here we propose a framework to encourage research programmes in the field of "human auditory ecology," focusing on the study of human auditory perception of ecological processes at work in natural habitats. Based on large acoustic databases with high ecological validity, these programmes should investigate the extent to which this presumably ancestral monitoring function of the human auditory system is adapted to specific information conveyed by natural soundscapes, whether it operate throughout the life span or whether it emerges through individual learning or cultural transmission. Beyond fundamental knowledge of human hearing, these programmes should yield a better understanding of how normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners monitor rural and city green and blue spaces and benefit from them, and whether rehabilitation devices (hearing aids and cochlear implants) restore natural soundscape perception and emotional responses back to normal. Importantly, they should also reveal whether and how humans hear the rapid changes in the environment brought about by human activity.

Citing Articles

Developmental origins of natural sound perception.

Polver S, Miller-Viacava N, Fraticelli M, Gervain J, Lorenzi C Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1474961.

PMID: 39726626 PMC: 11669913. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474961.


Sounds of Nature and Hearing Loss: A Call to Action.

Lelic D, Picou E, Shafiro V, Lorenzi C Ear Hear. 2024; 46(2):298-304.

PMID: 39506198 PMC: 11825482. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001601.

References
1.
McWalter R, Dau T . Cascaded Amplitude Modulations in Sound Texture Perception. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11:485. PMC: 5601004. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00485. View

2.
Ramus F, Nespor M, Mehler J . Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition. 1999; 73(3):265-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00058-x. View

3.
He F, Stevenson I, Escabi M . Two stages of bandwidth scaling drives efficient neural coding of natural sounds. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(2):e1010862. PMC: 9970106. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010862. View

4.
Hale R, Swearer S . Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions. Proc Biol Sci. 2016; 283(1824). PMC: 4760169. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2647. View

5.
Holleman G, Hooge I, Kemner C, Hessels R . The 'Real-World Approach' and Its Problems: A Critique of the Term Ecological Validity. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:721. PMC: 7204431. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00721. View