» Articles » PMID: 36312201

What Do We Mean with Sound Semantics, Exactly? A Survey of Taxonomies and Ontologies of Everyday Sounds

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Oct 31
PMID 36312201
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Taxonomies and ontologies for the characterization of everyday sounds have been developed in several research fields, including auditory cognition, soundscape research, artificial hearing, sound design, and medicine. Here, we surveyed 36 of such knowledge organization systems, which we identified through a systematic literature search. To evaluate the semantic domains covered by these systems within a homogeneous framework, we introduced a comprehensive set of verbal sound descriptors (sound source properties; attributes of sensation; sound signal descriptors; onomatopoeias; music genres), which we used to manually label the surveyed descriptor classes. We reveal that most taxonomies and ontologies were developed to characterize higher-level semantic relations between sound sources in terms of the sound-generating objects and actions involved (what/how), or in terms of the environmental context (where). This indicates the current lack of a comprehensive ontology of everyday sounds that covers simultaneously all semantic aspects of the relation between sounds. Such an ontology may have a wide range of applications and purposes, ranging from extending our scientific knowledge of auditory processes in the real world, to developing artificial hearing systems.

Citing Articles

Evaluating causes and gestures: source-related and crossmodal features in the perception of environmental sounds.

Lembke S Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1520209.

PMID: 39989628 PMC: 11842436. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1520209.


Bridging auditory perception and natural language processing with semantically informed deep neural networks.

Esposito M, Valente G, Plasencia-Calana Y, Dumontier M, Giordano B, Formisano E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20994.

PMID: 39251659 PMC: 11383964. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71693-9.

References
1.
Lewis J, Brefczynski J, Phinney R, Janik J, DeYoe E . Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(21):5148-58. PMC: 6724809. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0419-05.2005. View

2.
Houix O, Lemaitre G, Misdariis N, Susini P, Urdapilleta I . A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011; 18(1):52-80. DOI: 10.1037/a0026240. View

3.
Gygi B, Kidd G, Watson C . Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Percept Psychophys. 2007; 69(6):839-55. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193921. View

4.
Lafay G, Rossignol M, Misdariis N, LaGrange M, Petiot J . Investigating the perception of soundscapes through acoustic scene simulation. Behav Res Methods. 2018; 51(2):532-555. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1138-0. View

5.
Guyot P, Houix O, Misdariis N, Susini P, Pinquier J, Andre-Obrecht R . Identification of categories of liquid sounds. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 142(2):878. DOI: 10.1121/1.4996124. View