» Articles » PMID: 23404678

VAT=TAAT-SAAT: Innovative Anthropometric Model to Predict Visceral Adipose Tissue Without Resort to CT-Scan or DXA

Overview
Date 2013 Feb 14
PMID 23404678
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether a combination of a selected but limited number of anthropometric measurements predicts visceral adipose tissue (VAT) better than other anthropometric measurements, without resort to medical imaging.

Hypothesis: Abdominal anthropometric measurements are total abdominal adipose tissue indicators and global measures of VAT and SAAT (subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue). Therefore, subtracting the anthropometric measurement the more correlated possible with SAAT while being the least correlated possible with VAT, from the most correlated abdominal anthropometric measurement with VAT while being highly correlated with TAAT, may better predict VAT.

Design And Methods: BMI participants' range was from 16.3 to 52.9 kg m(-2) . Anthropometric and abdominal adipose tissues data by computed tomography (CT-Scan) were available in 253 patients (18-78 years) (CHU Nord, Marseille) and used to develop the anthropometric VAT prediction models.

Results: Subtraction of proximal thigh circumference from waist circumference, adjusted to age and/or BMI, predicts better VAT (Women: VAT = 2.15 × Waist C - 3.63 × Proximal Thigh C + 1.46 × Age + 6.22 × BMI - 92.713; R(2) = 0.836. Men: VAT = 6 × Waist C - 4.41 × proximal thigh C + 1.19 × Age - 213.65; R(2) = 0.803) than the best single anthropometric measurement or the association of two anthropometric measurements highly correlated with VAT. Both multivariate models showed no collinearity problem. Selected models demonstrate high sensitivity (97.7% in women, 100% in men). Similar predictive abilities were observed in the validation sample (Women: R(2) = 76%; Men: R(2) = 70%). Bland and Altman method showed no systematic estimation error of VAT.

Conclusion: Validated in a large range of age and BMI, our results suggest the usefulness of the anthropometric selected models to predict VAT in Europides (South of France).

Citing Articles

Metabolic Syndrome, Kidney-Related Adiposity, and Kidney Microcirculation: Unraveling the Damage.

Jang K, Hur J, Lee D, Kim S Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767613 PMC: 11673429. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122706.


Novel Biomarkers of Grade I Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

Braha A, Timar B, Ivan V, Balica M, Daniluc L, Timar R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407960 PMC: 11477181. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195901.


Digital Biometry as an Obesity Diagnosis Tool: A Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.

Porterfield F, Shapoval V, Langlet J, Samouda H, Stanford F Life (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39202689 PMC: 11355313. DOI: 10.3390/life14080947.


Prediction of future visceral adiposity and application to cancer research: The Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Wilkens L, Castelfranco A, Monroe K, Kristal B, Cheng I, Maskarinec G PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306606.

PMID: 39024224 PMC: 11257330. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306606.


Assessment of whole-body and regional body fat using abdominal quantitative computed tomography in Chinese women and men.

Mai J, Wu Q, Wu H, Zeng C, Li Y, Shang J Lipids Health Dis. 2024; 23(1):47.

PMID: 38355592 PMC: 10865662. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02034-y.


References
1.
Poirier P, Despres J . Waist circumference, visceral obesity, and cardiovascular risk. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003; 23(3):161-9. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200305000-00001. View

2.
Clasey J, Bouchard C, Teates C, Riblett J, Thorner M, Hartman M . The use of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures to estimate total abdominal and abdominal visceral fat in men and women. Obes Res. 1999; 7(3):256-64. DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00404.x. View

3.
Svendsen O, Hassager C, Bergmann I, Christiansen C . Measurement of abdominal and intra-abdominal fat in postmenopausal women by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry: comparison with computerized tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993; 17(1):45-51. View

4.
Hill A, LaForgia J, Coates A, Buckley J, Howe P . Estimating abdominal adipose tissue with DXA and anthropometry. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15(2):504-10. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.629. View

5.
Lee S, Janssen I, Ross R . Interindividual variation in abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: influence of measurement site. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004; 97(3):948-54. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01200.2003. View