» Articles » PMID: 17284730

Approximation of Total Visceral Adipose Tissue with a Single Magnetic Resonance Image

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Feb 8
PMID 17284730
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A single axial image measured between the 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5) is most frequently chosen to approximate total abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume, but growing evidence suggests that this measurement site is not ideal.

Objective: The objective was to determine the single magnetic resonance (MR) image that best approximates the total VAT volume in a biracial sample of healthy subjects.

Design: We used contiguous abdominal MR images to measure VAT area and summed them to determine total VAT volume. The sample included 820 healthy men and women (n = 692 whites, 128 blacks) aged 18-88 y.

Results: A range of MR images had equally high correlations with total VAT in each race and sex group. The image 6 cm above L4-L5 (L4-L5 + 6) was within the best equivalent range for all race and sex groups. The L4-L5 + 6 image crossed the L3 vertebra in 85% of subjects and crossed the L2-L3 intervertebral space or the L2 vertebra for 15% of subjects. Linear regression models indicated that the L4-L5 + 6 image explained 97% of the variance in total abdominal VAT volume, and additional covariates did not increase the R(2) value significantly. The L4-L5 image explained 83% of the variance in VAT volume, and the covariates accounted for an additional 7% of the variance. Rank-order values for VAT can change if total VAT volume is approximated by a single image area. Whereas 25% of subjects changed rank by >or=10% with the L4-L5 image, only 3% changed rank to that degree with the L4-L5 + 6 image.

Conclusions: A single MR image located approximately at the L3 vertebra can accurately estimate total VAT volume in blacks and whites of both sexes.

Citing Articles

The Protocol for the Multi-Ethnic, multi-centre raNdomised controlled trial of a low-energy Diet for improving functional status in heart failure with Preserved ejection fraction (AMEND Preserved).

Bilak J, Squire I, Wormleighton J, Brown R, Hadjiconstantinou M, Robertson N BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e094722.

PMID: 39880434 PMC: 11781100. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094722.


Changes in abdominal adipose tissues and ectopic fat depots during pregnancy are dissociated from gestational weight gain.

Mogensen C, Magkos F, Chabanova E, Molgaard C, Geiker N Obesity (Silver Spring). 2025; 33(2):238-242.

PMID: 39749416 PMC: 11773999. DOI: 10.1002/oby.24176.


Impact of exercise training in combination with dapagliflozin on physical function in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for the Dapagliflozin, Exercise Training and physicAl function (DETA) randomised controlled trial.

Sargeant J, Ahmad E, James E, Baker L, Bilak J, Coull N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e084482.

PMID: 39592159 PMC: 11590848. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084482.


Differential association of abdominal, liver, and epicardial adiposity with anthropometry, diabetes, and cardiac remodeling in Asians.

Lee V, Han Y, Toh D, Bryant J, Boubertakh R, Le T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1439691.

PMID: 39257902 PMC: 11385302. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1439691.


Correlation between Pancreatic Fat Deposition and Metabolic Syndrome: Relationships with Location in the Pancreas and Sex.

Ookura R, Usuki N, Miki Y Intern Med. 2024; 63(15):2113-2123.

PMID: 38171856 PMC: 11358728. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2450-23.


References
1.
Ross R, Freeman J, Janssen I . Exercise alone is an effective strategy for reducing obesity and related comorbidities. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000; 28(4):165-70. View

2.
Wajchenberg B . Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2001; 21(6):697-738. DOI: 10.1210/edrv.21.6.0415. View

3.
Janssen I, Fortier A, Hudson R, Ross R . Effects of an energy-restrictive diet with or without exercise on abdominal fat, intermuscular fat, and metabolic risk factors in obese women. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(3):431-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.3.431. View

4.
Greenfield J, Samaras K, Chisholm D, Campbell L . Regional intra-subject variability in abdominal adiposity limits usefulness of computed tomography. Obes Res. 2002; 10(4):260-5. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2002.35. View

5.
Boyko E, Fujimoto W, Leonetti D, Newell-Morris L . Visceral adiposity and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study among Japanese Americans. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(4):465-71. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.4.465. View