The CurvHDR Method for Gating Flow Cytometry Samples
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: High-throughput flow cytometry experiments produce hundreds of large multivariate samples of cellular characteristics. These samples require specialized processing to obtain clinically meaningful measurements. A major component of this processing is a form of cell subsetting known as gating. Manual gating is time-consuming and subjective. Good automatic and semi-automatic gating algorithms are very beneficial to high-throughput flow cytometry.
Results: We develop a statistical procedure, named curvHDR, for automatic and semi-automatic gating. The method combines the notions of significant high negative curvature regions and highest density regions and has the ability to adapt well to human-perceived gates. The underlying principles apply to dimension of arbitrary size, although we focus on dimensions up to three. Accompanying software, compatible with contemporary flow cytometry infor-matics, is developed.
Conclusion: The method is seen to adapt well to nuances in the data and, to a reasonable extent, match human perception of useful gates. It offers big savings in human labour when processing high-throughput flow cytometry data whilst retaining a good degree of efficacy.
Bottcher C, Schlickeiser S, Sneeboer M, Kunkel D, Knop A, Paza E Nat Neurosci. 2018; 22(1):78-90.
PMID: 30559476 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0290-2.
Less effective selection leads to larger genomes.
Lefebure T, Morvan C, Malard F, Francois C, Konecny-Dupre L, Gueguen L Genome Res. 2017; 27(6):1016-1028.
PMID: 28424354 PMC: 5453316. DOI: 10.1101/gr.212589.116.
Toward deterministic and semiautomated SPADE analysis.
Qiu P Cytometry A. 2017; 91(3):281-289.
PMID: 28234411 PMC: 5410769. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23068.
Unfold High-Dimensional Clouds for Exhaustive Gating of Flow Cytometry Data.
Qiu P IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2015; 11(6):1045-51.
PMID: 26357042 PMC: 4866872. DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2014.2321403.
Response of Prochlorococcus to varying CO2:O2 ratios.
Bagby S, Chisholm S ISME J. 2015; 9(10):2232-45.
PMID: 25848872 PMC: 4579476. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.36.