» Articles » PMID: 23380152

Probability of Cavitation for Single Ultrasound Pulses Applied to Tissues and Tissue-mimicking Materials

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Feb 6
PMID 23380152
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, the negative pressure values at which inertial cavitation consistently occurs in response to a single, two-cycle, focused ultrasound pulse were measured in several media relevant to cavitation-based ultrasound therapy. The pulse was focused into a chamber containing one of the media, which included liquids, tissue-mimicking materials, and ex vivo canine tissue. Focal waveforms were measured by two separate techniques using a fiber-optic hydrophone. Inertial cavitation was identified by high-speed photography in optically transparent media and an acoustic passive cavitation detector. The probability of cavitation (P(cav)) for a single pulse as a function of peak negative pressure (p(-)) followed a sigmoid curve, with the probability approaching one when the pressure amplitude was sufficient. The statistical threshold (defined as P(cav) = 0.5) was between p(-) = 26 and 30 MPa in all samples with high water content but varied between p(-) = 13.7 and >36 MPa in other media. A model for radial cavitation bubble dynamics was employed to evaluate the behavior of cavitation nuclei at these pressure levels. A single bubble nucleus with an inertial cavitation threshold of p(-) = 28.2 megapascals was estimated to have a 2.5 nm radius in distilled water. These data may be valuable for cavitation-based ultrasound therapy to predict the likelihood of cavitation at various pressure levels and dimensions of cavitation-induced lesions in tissue.

Citing Articles

Precision oncology: The role of minimally-invasive ablation therapy in the management of solid organ tumors.

Fazlollahi F, Makary M World J Radiol. 2025; 17(1):98618.

PMID: 39876886 PMC: 11755905. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.98618.


A pre-clinical MRI-guided all-in-one focused ultrasound system for murine brain studies.

Kaovasia T, Duclos S, Gupta D, Kalayeh K, Fabiilli M, Noll D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):144.

PMID: 39747938 PMC: 11696467. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84078-9.


Acoustic-pressure-driven ultrasonic activation of the mechanosensitive receptor RET and of cell proliferation in colonic tissue.

Zamfirov L, Nguyen N, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Cambronera Ghiglione P, Teston E, Dizeux A Nat Biomed Eng. 2024; .

PMID: 39706982 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-024-01300-9.


Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.

Bader K, Padilla F, Haworth K, Ellens N, Dalecki D, Miller D J Ultrasound Med. 2024; 44(3):381-433.

PMID: 39526313 PMC: 11796337. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16611.


Development of an Injectable Hydrogel for Histotripsy Ablation Toward Future Glioblastoma Therapy Applications.

Khan Z, Zhang J, Gannon J, Johnson B, Verbridge S, Vlaisavljevich E Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(12):3157-3171.

PMID: 39210157 PMC: 11561036. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03601-1.


References
1.
Apfel R, Holland C . Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1991; 17(2):179-85. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(91)90125-g. View

2.
Maxwell A, Wang T, Yuan L, Duryea A, Xu Z, Cain C . A tissue phantom for visualization and measurement of ultrasound-induced cavitation damage. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010; 36(12):2132-43. PMC: 2997329. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.08.023. View

3.
KEITER H, Berman H, Jones H, MacLACHLAN E . The chemical composition of normal human red blood cells, including variability among centrifuged cells. Blood. 1955; 10(4):370-6. View

4.
Samani A, Bishop J, Luginbuhl C, Plewes D . Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. Phys Med Biol. 2003; 48(14):2183-98. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/14/310. View

5.
Freund J . Suppression of shocked-bubble expansion due to tissue confinement with application to shock-wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123(5):2867-74. PMC: 2677318. DOI: 10.1121/1.2902171. View