» Articles » PMID: 23341125

Is Evaluation of the Presence of Prepectoral Edema on T2-weighted with Fat-suppression 3 T Breast MRI a Simple and Readily Available Noninvasive Technique for Estimation of Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer?

Overview
Journal Breast Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Jan 24
PMID 23341125
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The specificity of breast MRI is only moderate. The unsatisfactory specificity of breast MRI has prompted evaluation of high signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence of prepectoral edema determined using high SI on T2WI with fat-suppression 3 T MRI and to correlate its presence with prognostic factors of breast cancer.

Methods: The retrospective study comprised 589 consecutive histopathologically confirmed lesions, 460 malignant and 129 benign, identified by 3 T MRI. Presence of prepectoral edema was evaluated on T2WI with fat suppression, and its diagnostic value for malignancies and correlation with clinicopathological findings in histopathologically confirmed breast cancer were assessed.

Results: Prepectoral edema was present in 54 of the 460 breast cancers (9 % of the total 589) and none of the 129 benign lesions. Its sensitivity and specificity were 12 and 100 %, respectively. The positive predictive value was 100 %. Young age (p = 0.01), large tumor size (p < 0.0001), high histological grade (p < 0.0001), invasive ductal carcinoma (p < 0.0001), high lymphovascular invasion degree (p < 0.0001), high axillary lymph node positivity (p < 0.0001), high inflammatory breast cancer rate (p < 0.0001), high neoadjuvant chemotherapy rate (p < 0.0001), and chemoresistant breast cancers (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with prepectoral edema. There was no association of the morphological lesion type on MRI and dynamic enhancement imaging pattern with the presence of prepectoral edema.

Conclusion: Prepectoral edema has low prevalence but is specific for breast cancer and correlated with prognostic factors.

Citing Articles

The combination of focal breast edema and adjacent vessel sign to assess the behavior of mass-type invasive ductal carcinoma.

Hu J, Ke J, Xu S, Pei L, Cao L, Zhou H BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):332.

PMID: 39639228 PMC: 11622627. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01518-8.


Integrative radiomics clustering analysis to decipher breast cancer heterogeneity and prognostic indicators through multiparametric MRI.

He Y, Duan S, Wang W, Yang H, Pan S, Cheng W NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024; 10(1):72.

PMID: 39112498 PMC: 11306571. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00678-8.


The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy.

Washington I, Palm R, White J, Rosenberg S, Ataya D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893241 PMC: 11171236. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112122.


Peritumoral Fat Content Identified Using Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares Estimation (IDEAL) Correlates with Breast Cancer Prognosis.

Tani N, Koreeda Y, Nawata A, Fujisaki A, Hayashida Y, Shimajiri S Magn Reson Med Sci. 2024; 24(1):112-121.

PMID: 38325834 PMC: 11733510. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0127.


Prognostic Implication of Focal Breast Edema on Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients.

Sung P, Lee J, Cheun J, Choi I, Park J, Park J J Breast Cancer. 2023; 26(5):479-491.

PMID: 37704381 PMC: 10625867. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e35.