» Articles » PMID: 33649288

Comparison of the Performance of 24 Early Warning Scores with the Updated National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for Predicting Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission in Postoperative Brain Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Study at a Single...

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2021 Mar 2
PMID 33649288
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND There have been few studies to evaluate early warning score (EWS) systems, or track and trigger systems (TTS), to identify early clinical deterioration in patients following brain tumor surgery who are admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) is an established method used in the U.K. National Health Service to improve care for in-hospital patients. This retrospective study from a single center aimed to compare the performance of NEWS2 with 24 other types of EWS to evaluate unplanned ICU admissions within 72 h after brain tumor surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 326 patients with brain tumors were included in the study. Patients who experienced unplanned ICU transfer after surgery (69 cases) were diagnostically matched with patients who did not require intensive care (257 controls). We collected the physiological variables to calculate the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, Youden index values, cutoff values, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. RESULTS The NEWS2 identified postoperative brain tumor patients with AUROC (0.860, p=0.000). The Patient-At-Risk (PAR) score was higher than NEWS2 in terms of AUROC value (0.870, P=0.000), Youden index (0.589 vs 0.542). CONCLUSIONS The findings showed that although the NEWS 2 performed well when used to evaluate unplanned ICU admissions within 72 h of postoperative brain tumor patients, the PAR score was also an accurate EWS.

Citing Articles

Improving escalation of deteriorating patients through cognitive task analysis: Understanding differences between work-as-prescribed and work-as-done.

Ede J, Hutton R, Watkinson P, Kent B, Endacott R Int J Nurs Stud. 2024; 151:104671.

PMID: 38237323 PMC: 10882274. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104671.


Patient Characteristics and Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Unplanned Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit Admissions: A Retrospective Analysis.

Khanna A, Moucharite M, Benefield P, Kaw R Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023; 15:703-719.

PMID: 37780944 PMC: 10541084. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S424759.

References
1.
Taenzer A, Pyke J, McGrath S, Blike G . Impact of pulse oximetry surveillance on rescue events and intensive care unit transfers: a before-and-after concurrence study. Anesthesiology. 2010; 112(2):282-7. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ca7a9b. View

2.
Ludikhuize J, Hamming A, de Jonge E, Fikkers B . Rapid response systems in The Netherlands. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37(3):138-44, 97. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37017-1. View

3.
von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Midgley K, Lieberbach S, Barnard L, Glasmacher A, Gilleece M . Observation-based early warning scores to detect impending critical illness predict in-hospital and overall survival in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007; 13(5):568-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.12.455. View

4.
ODriscoll B, Howard L, Earis J, Mak V . British Thoracic Society Guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017; 4(1):e000170. PMC: 5531304. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000170. View

5.
Heaps N, Thorley K, Langley S . Critical care outreach: creating a safe culture. Br J Nurs. 2006; 14(22):1208-11. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.22.20690. View