» Articles » PMID: 23316428

Effectiveness of Physical Therapist Administered Spinal Manipulation for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: a Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 15
PMID 23316428
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Context: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disorder in society that has been associated with increased loss of work time and medical expenses. A common intervention for LBP is spinal manipulation, a technique that is not specific to one scope of practice or profession.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of physical therapy spinal manipulations for the treatment of patients with low back pain.

Methods: A search of the current literature was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Pro Quest Nursing and Allied Health Source, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Studies were included if each involved: 1) individuals with LBP; 2) spinal manipulations performed by physical therapists compared to any control group that did not receive manipulations; 3) measurable clinical outcomes or efficiency of treatment measures, and 4) randomized control trials. The quality of included articles was determined by two independent authors using the criteria developed and used by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).

Results: Six randomized control trials met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The most commonly used outcomes in these studies were some variation of pain rating scales and disability indexes. Notable results included varying degrees of effect sizes favoring physical therapy spinal manipulations and minimal adverse events resulting from this intervention. Additionally, the manipulation group in one study reported statistically significantly less medication use, health care utilization, and lost work time.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this systematic review there is evidence to support the use of spinal manipulation by physical therapists in clinical practice. Physical therapy spinal manipulation appears to be a safe intervention that improves clinical outcomes for patients with low back pain.

Citing Articles

An international consensus on gaps in mechanisms of forced-based manipulation research: findings from a nominal group technique.

Keter D, Bent J, Bialosky J, Courtney C, Esteves J, Funabashi M J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(1):111-117.

PMID: 37840477 PMC: 10795550. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2262336.


Definition and classification for adverse events following spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilization: A scoping review.

Funabashi M, Gorrell L, Pohlman K, Bergna A, Heneghan N PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0270671.

PMID: 35839253 PMC: 9286262. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270671.


Changes in Pain Catastrophizing and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs as Mediators of Early Physical Therapy on Disability and Pain in Acute Low-Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.

Sisco-Taylor B, Magel J, McFadden M, Greene T, Shen J, Fritz J Pain Med. 2021; 23(6):1127-1137.

PMID: 34613379 PMC: 9157170. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab292.


Effectiveness of treatments for acute and subacute mechanical non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Gianola S, Bargeri S, Del Castillo G, Corbetta D, Turolla A, Andreano A Br J Sports Med. 2021; 56(1):41-50.

PMID: 33849907 PMC: 8685632. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103596.


Use of thrust joint manipulation by student physical therapists in the United States during clinical education experiences.

Corkery M, Hensley C, Cesario C, Yen S, Chui K, Courtney C J Man Manip Ther. 2020; 28(5):266-274.

PMID: 32031508 PMC: 7734017. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1720948.


References
1.
Ernst E, Canter P . A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. J R Soc Med. 2006; 99(4):192-6. PMC: 1420782. DOI: 10.1177/014107680609900418. View

2.
Flynn T, Wainner R, Fritz J . Spinal manipulation in physical therapist professional degree education: A model for teaching and integration into clinical practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(8):577-87. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2159. View

3.
Hallegraeff J, Hallegraeff H, de Greef M, Winters J, Lucas C . Manipulative therapy and clinical prediction criteria in treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain. Percept Mot Skills. 2009; 108(1):196-208. DOI: 10.2466/PMS.108.1.196-208. View

4.
Carlesso L, MacDermid J, Santaguida L . Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy: application to the cervical spine. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 40(8):455-63. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3229. View

5.
Cleland J, Fritz J, Kulig K, Davenport T, Eberhart S, Magel J . Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(25):2720-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b48809. View