» Articles » PMID: 26309386

Safety of Thrust Joint Manipulation in the Thoracic Spine: a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 27
PMID 26309386
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There appears to be very little in the research literature on the safety of thrust joint manipulation (TJM) when applied to the thoracic spine.

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze all available documented case reports in the literature describing patients who had experienced severe adverse events (AE) after receiving TJM to their thoracic spine.

Data Sources: Case reports published in peer reviewed journals were searched in Medline (using Ovid Technologies, Inc.), Science Direct, Web of Science, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), Index of Chiropractic literature, AMED (Allied and Alternative Medicine Database), PubMed and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINHAL) from January 1950 to February 2015.

Study Selection: Case reports were included if they: (1) were peer-reviewed; (2) were published between 1950 and 2015; (3) provided case reports or case series; and (4) had TJM as an intervention. Articles were excluded if: (1) the AE occurred without TJM (e.g. spontaneous); (2) the article was a systematic or literature review; or (3) it was written in a language other than English or Spanish.

Data Extraction: Data extracted from each case report included: gender; age; who performed the TJM and why; presence of contraindications; the number of manipulation interventions performed; initial symptoms experienced after the TJM; as well as type of severe AE that resulted.

Results: Ten cases, reported in 7 case reports, were reviewed. Cases involved females (8) more than males (2), with mean age being 43.5 years (SD=18.73, Range = 17 -71). The most frequent AE reported was injury (mechanical or vascular) to the spinal cord (7/10), with pneumothorax and hematothorax (2/10) and CSF leak secondary to dural sleeve injury (1/10).

Limitations: There were only a small number of case reports published in the literature and there may have been discrepancies between what was reported and what actually occurred, since physicians dealing with the effects of the AE, rather than the clinician performing the TJM, published the cases.

Conclusions: Serious AE do occur in the thoracic spine, most commonly, trauma to the spinal cord, followed by pneumothorax. This suggests that excessive peak forces may have been applied to thoracic spine, and it should serve as a cautionary note for clinicians to decrease these peak forces.

Citing Articles

Current State of Dry Needling Practices: A Comprehensive Analysis on Use, Training, and Safety.

Valera-Calero J, Plaza-Manzano G, Rabanal-Rodriguez G, Diaz-Arribas M, Kobylarz M, Buffet-Garcia J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597054 PMC: 11596814. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111869.


Bilateral hand dystonia following high-velocity thrust manipulation: a case report.

Chang M, Boudier-Reveret M, Brutus J, Yang S J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(10):3000605241289284.

PMID: 39387192 PMC: 11483671. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241289284.


Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of spinal manipulation: a cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists.

Mourad F, Stella Yousif M, Maselli F, Pellicciari L, Meroni R, Dunning J Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):38.

PMID: 36096835 PMC: 9465888. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00449-x.


Spinal manipulation and adverse event reporting in the pregnant patient limits estimation of relative risk: a narrative review.

Stickler K, Kearns G J Man Manip Ther. 2022; 31(3):162-173.

PMID: 36047253 PMC: 10288923. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2118653.


Definition and classification for adverse events following spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilization: A scoping review.

Funabashi M, Gorrell L, Pohlman K, Bergna A, Heneghan N PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0270671.

PMID: 35839253 PMC: 9286262. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270671.


References
1.
Thomas L, Rivett D, Attia J, Parsons M, Levi C . Risk factors and clinical features of craniocervical arterial dissection. Man Ther. 2011; 16(4):351-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2010.12.008. View

2.
Vernon H . The effectiveness of spinal manipulation for the treatment of headache disorders: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Cephalalgia. 2003; 23(6):479-80; author reply 480-1. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.05551.x. View

3.
Carnes D, Mullinger B, Underwood M . Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther. 2009; 15(1):2-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2009.02.003. View

4.
Stemper B, Hallman J, Peterson B . An experimental study of chest compression during chiropractic manipulation of the thoracic spine using an anthropomorphic test device. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011; 34(5):290-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.04.001. View

5.
Kerry R, Taylor A, Mitchell J, McCarthy C, Brew J . Manual therapy and cervical arterial dysfunction, directions for the future: a clinical perspective. J Man Manip Ther. 2009; 16(1):39-48. PMC: 2565074. DOI: 10.1179/106698108790818620. View