» Articles » PMID: 35839253

Definition and Classification for Adverse Events Following Spinal and Peripheral Joint Manipulation and Mobilization: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jul 15
PMID 35839253
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilization are interventions used by many healthcare providers to manage musculoskeletal conditions. Although there are many reports of adverse events (or undesirable outcomes) following such interventions, there is no common definition for an adverse event or clarity on any severity classification. This impedes advances of patient safety initiatives and practice. This scoping review mapped the evidence of adverse event definitions and classification systems following spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilization for musculoskeletal conditions in adults.

Methods: An electronic search of the following databases was performed from inception to February 2021: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, AMED, ICL, PEDro, Cochrane Library, Open Grey and Open Theses and Dissertations. Studies including adults (18 to 65 years old) with a musculoskeletal condition receiving spinal or peripheral joint manipulation or mobilization and providing an adverse event definition and/or classification were included. All study designs of peer-reviewed publications were considered. Data from included studies were charted using a standardized data extraction form and synthesised using narrative analysis.

Results: From 8248 identified studies, 98 were included in the final synthesis. A direct definition for an adverse event and/or classification system was provided in 69 studies, while 29 provided an indirect definition and/or classification system. The most common descriptors to define an adverse event were causality, symptom severity, onset and duration. Twenty-three studies that provided a classification system described only the end anchors (e.g., mild/minor and/or serious) of the classification while 26 described multiple categories (e.g., moderate, severe).

Conclusion: A vast array of terms, definition and classification systems were identified. There is no one common definition or classification for adverse events following spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilization. Findings support the urgent need for consensus on the terms, definition and classification system for adverse events related to these interventions.

Citing Articles

What's the harm? Results of an active surveillance adverse event reporting system for chiropractors and physiotherapists.

Pohlman K, Funabashi M, OBeirne M, Cassidy J, Hill M, Hurwitz E PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309069.

PMID: 39159155 PMC: 11332930. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309069.


The World Federation of Chiropractic Global Patient Safety Task Force: a call to action.

Coleman B, Rubinstein S, Salsbury S, Swain M, Brown R, Pohlman K Chiropr Man Therap. 2024; 32(1):15.

PMID: 38741191 PMC: 11092090. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00536-1.


Reporting of adverse events associated with spinal manipulation in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic review.

Gorrell L, Brown B, Engel R, Lystad R BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e067526.

PMID: 37142321 PMC: 10163511. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067526.


A retrospective analysis of the incidence of severe adverse events among recipients of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy.

Chu E, Trager R, Lee L, Niazi I Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1254.

PMID: 36690712 PMC: 9870863. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28520-4.

References
1.
Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, Goucke R, Nagree Y, Gibberd M . What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 54(2):79-86. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099878. View

2.
Dagenais S, Brady O, Haldeman S . Shared decision making through informed consent in chiropractic management of low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012; 35(3):216-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.004. View

3.
Puentedura E, Landers M, Cleland J, Mintken P, Huijbregts P, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C . Thoracic spine thrust manipulation versus cervical spine thrust manipulation in patients with acute neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41(4):208-20. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3640. View

4.
Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Wulf Hanson S, Chatterji S, Vos T . Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020; 396(10267):2006-2017. PMC: 7811204. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. View

5.
MacPherson H, Newbronner E, Chamberlain R, Hopton A . Patients' experiences and expectations of chiropractic care: a national cross-sectional survey. Chiropr Man Therap. 2015; 23(1):3. PMC: 4307916. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-014-0049-0. View