» Articles » PMID: 23299614

Feasibility of Low-radiation-dose CT for Abdominal Examinations with Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: Low-contrast Phantom Study

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 10
PMID 23299614
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the image quality of low-radiation-dose CT using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and to compare the results with those of filtered back projection (FBP) at routine doses. We measured the mean values and standard deviation of the CT numbers within and outside a 15-mm low-contrast object cylinder at 1.0% contrast level. The noise reduction levels of the HIR were 1 (weak) to 7 (strong). Visual inspection of the low-contrast detectability was done by six radiologic technologists. The low-contrast detectability of the cylinder at the 1.0% contrast level with HIR at all mAs levels was equal to that obtained with FBP, and thus the use of HIR did not result in any improvement of low-contrast detectability.

Citing Articles

Estimating subjective evaluation of low-contrast resolution using convolutional neural networks.

Doi Y, Teramoto A, Yamada A, Kobayashi M, Saito K, Fujita H Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021; 44(4):1285-1296.

PMID: 34633630 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01062-7.


Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques.

I S, C A, H S, P T, T F J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020; 10(2):215-224.

PMID: 32337189 PMC: 7166214. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1013.


Impact of hybrid iterative reconstruction on unenhanced liver CT.

Kondo M, Nishie A, Fujita N, Morita K, Shirasaka T, Arimura H Br J Radiol. 2016; 90(1070):20150670.

PMID: 27993096 PMC: 5685099. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150670.

References
1.
Murazaki H, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Fujioka C, Tomiguchi S . [Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011; 67(4):360-6. DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.67.360. View

2.
Takata T, Ichikawa K, Hayashi H, Mitsui W, Sakuta K, Koshida H . [Image quality evaluation of new image reconstruction methods applying the iterative reconstruction]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2012; 68(4):404-12. DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2012_jsrt_68.4.404. View

3.
Sagara Y, Hara A, Pavlicek W, Silva A, Paden R, Wu Q . Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(3):713-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2989. View

4.
Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G . CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. Phys Med. 2011; 28(2):161-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.03.003. View

5.
Hara A, Paden R, Silva A, Kujak J, Lawder H, Pavlicek W . Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(3):764-71. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2397. View