» Articles » PMID: 15070562

Risk of Cancer from Diagnostic X-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 Other Countries

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2004 Apr 9
PMID 15070562
Citations 439
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diagnostic X-rays are the largest man-made source of radiation exposure to the general population, contributing about 14% of the total annual exposure worldwide from all sources. Although diagnostic X-rays provide great benefits, that their use involves some small risk of developing cancer is generally accepted. Our aim was to estimate the extent of this risk on the basis of the annual number of diagnostic X-rays undertaken in the UK and in 14 other developed countries.

Methods: We combined data on the frequency of diagnostic X-ray use, estimated radiation doses from X-rays to individual body organs, and risk models, based mainly on the Japanese atomic bomb survivors, with population-based cancer incidence rates and mortality rates for all causes of death, using life table methods.

Findings: Our results indicate that in the UK about 0.6% of the cumulative risk of cancer to age 75 years could be attributable to diagnostic X-rays. This percentage is equivalent to about 700 cases of cancer per year. In 13 other developed countries, estimates of the attributable risk ranged from 0.6% to 1.8%, whereas in Japan, which had the highest estimated annual exposure frequency in the world, it was more than 3%.

Interpretation: We provide detailed estimates of the cancer risk from diagnostic X-rays. The calculations involved a number of assumptions and so are inevitably subject to considerable uncertainty. The possibility that we have overestimated the risks cannot be ruled out, but that we have underestimated them substantially seems unlikely.

Citing Articles

A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.

Kobayashi R, Uehara K, Ebata T, Yatsuya H, Li Y, Hida K Surg Today. 2025; .

PMID: 40011277 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w.


Ultrasound-guided vs. fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous leverage reduction for severely displaced radial neck fractures in children: a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Wu X, Xia J, Li X, Chen X, Wang S, Shen X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):106.

PMID: 39893394 PMC: 11787730. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08312-9.


Clinical consequence of the 4-week X-ray control after ESIN osteosynthesis of forearm fractures in children.

Wegner E, Laubach N, Schippers P, Schierjott L, Shrotriya R, Gercek E Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):19.

PMID: 39812803 PMC: 11735514. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02721-6.


A Comparative Study of Radiation Dose From Chest CT Scan Examinations in Two Imaging Centers in Duhok Province, Kurdistan, Iraq.

Mahmoud A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75135.

PMID: 39759664 PMC: 11700019. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75135.


Is fluoroscopy-free single-use flexible ureteroscopy a feasible treatment for kidney stones with abnormal renal anatomy?.

Aboutaleb H, Sultan M, Zaghloul A, Farahat Y, Gawish M, Zanaty F Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(4):591-595.

PMID: 39533995 PMC: 11551353. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.05.004.