» Articles » PMID: 23293458

Release and Toxicity of Dental Resin Composite

Overview
Journal Toxicol Int
Date 2013 Jan 8
PMID 23293458
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dental resin composite that are tooth-colored materials have been considered as possible substitutes to mercury-containing silver amalgam filling. Despite the fact that dental resin composites have improved their physico-chemical properties, the concern for its intrinsic toxicity remains high. Some components of restorative composite resins are released in the oral environment initially during polymerization reaction and later due to degradation of the material. In vitro and in vivo studies have clearly identified that these components of restorative composite resins are toxic. But there is a large gap between the results published by research laboratories and clinical reports. The objective of this manuscript was to review the literature on release phenomenon as well as in vitro and in vivo toxicity of dental resin composite. Interpretation made from the recent data was also outlined.

Citing Articles

Toxicity of resin-matrix composites in a dental clinical setting.

Cordeiro M, Souza J, Gomes A, Correia P, Fidalgo-Pereira R Odontology. 2025; .

PMID: 40088310 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-025-01055-y.


Dimensional Accuracy of Different Three-Dimensional Printing Models as a Function of Varying the Printing Parameters.

Arnold C, Riss L, Hey J, Schweyen R Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(14).

PMID: 39063907 PMC: 11279353. DOI: 10.3390/ma17143616.


The application of hydrogels for enamel remineralization.

Liao J, Qiu J, Lin Y, Li Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33574.

PMID: 39040369 PMC: 11261051. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33574.


Evaluation of dental pulp stem cells response to flowable nano-hybrid dental composites: A comparative analysis.

Rady D, Albar N, Khayat W, Khalil M, Raafat S, Ramadan M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303154.

PMID: 38739591 PMC: 11090312. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303154.


Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.

Radwanski M, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Siwecka N, Sokolowski J, Majsterek I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4124.

PMID: 38374199 PMC: 10876547. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.


References
1.
Myers D, Hutz R . Current status of potential bisphenol toxicity in dentistry. Gen Dent. 2011; 59(4):262-5. View

2.
Schmalz G . The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106(2 Pt 2):696-706. DOI: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos10602ii05.x. View

3.
Reichl F, Seiss M, Kleinsasser N, Kehe K, Kunzelmann K, Thomas P . Distribution and excretion of BisGMA in guinea pigs. J Dent Res. 2008; 87(4):378-80. DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700401. View

4.
Bouillaguet S, Shaw L, Gonzalez L, Wataha J, Krejci I . Long-term cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00804.x. View

5.
Reichl F, Durner J, Kunzelmann K, Hickel R, Spahl W, Hume W . Biological clearance of TEGDMA in guinea pigs. Arch Toxicol. 2001; 75(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002040000159. View