» Articles » PMID: 23181561

A Common Copy-number Breakpoint of ERBB2 Amplification in Breast Cancer Colocalizes with a Complex Block of Segmental Duplications

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Nov 28
PMID 23181561
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Segmental duplications (low-copy repeats) are the recently duplicated genomic segments in the human genome that display nearly identical (> 90%) sequences and account for about 5% of euchromatic regions. In germline, duplicated segments mediate nonallelic homologous recombination and thus cause both non-disease-causing copy-number variants and genomic disorders. To what extent duplicated segments play a role in somatic DNA rearrangements in cancer remains elusive. Duplicated segments often cluster and form genomic blocks enriched with both direct and inverted repeats (complex genomic regions). Such complex regions could be fragile and play a mechanistic role in the amplification of the ERBB2 gene in breast tumors, because repeated sequences are known to initiate gene amplification in model systems.

Methods: We conducted polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays for primary breast tumors and analyzed publically available array-comparative genomic hybridization data to map a common copy-number breakpoint in ERBB2-amplified primary breast tumors. We further used molecular, bioinformatics, and population-genetics approaches to define duplication contents, structural variants, and haplotypes within the common breakpoint.

Results: We found a large (> 300-kb) block of duplicated segments that was colocalized with a common-copy number breakpoint for ERBB2 amplification. The breakpoint that potentially initiated ERBB2 amplification localized in a region 1.5 megabases (Mb) on the telomeric side of ERBB2. The region is very complex, with extensive duplications of KRTAP genes, structural variants, and, as a result, a paucity of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Duplicated segments are varied in size and degree of sequence homology, indicating that duplications have occurred recurrently during genome evolution.

Conclusions: Amplification of the ERBB2 gene in breast tumors is potentially initiated by a complex region that has unusual genomic features and thus requires rigorous, labor-intensive investigation. The haplotypes we provide could be useful to identify the potential association between the complex region and ERBB2 amplification.

Citing Articles

Aneuploidy and complex genomic rearrangements in cancer evolution.

Baker T, Waise S, Tarabichi M, Van Loo P Nat Cancer. 2024; 5(2):228-239.

PMID: 38286829 PMC: 7616040. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00711-y.


Double-strand breaks induce inverted duplication chromosome rearrangements by a DNA polymerase δ-dependent mechanism.

Al-Zain A, Nester M, Ahmed I, Symington L Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7020.

PMID: 37919272 PMC: 10622511. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42640-5.


Multi-omic cross-sectional cohort study of pre-malignant Barrett's esophagus reveals early structural variation and retrotransposon activity.

Katz-Summercorn A, Jammula S, Frangou A, Peneva I, ODonovan M, Tripathi M Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1407.

PMID: 35301290 PMC: 8931005. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28237-4.


Distribution of copy number variations and rearrangement endpoints in human cancers with a review of literature.

Mirzaei G, Petreaca R Mutat Res. 2022; 824:111773.

PMID: 35091282 PMC: 11301607. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2021.111773.


Genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal a tandem amplification unit of 11 genes and mutations in mismatch repair genes in methotrexate-resistant HT-29 cells.

Kim A, Shin J, Seo J Exp Mol Med. 2021; 53(9):1344-1355.

PMID: 34521988 PMC: 8492700. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-021-00668-x.


References
1.
Liu P, Carvalho C, Hastings P, Lupski J . Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012; 22(3):211-20. PMC: 3378805. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.012. View

2.
Stark J, Pierce A, Oh J, Pastink A, Jasin M . Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(21):9305-16. PMC: 522275. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9305-9316.2004. View

3.
Moynahan M, Jasin M . Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11(3):196-207. PMC: 3261768. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2851. View

4.
Collins S, Groudine M . Amplification of endogenous myc-related DNA sequences in a human myeloid leukaemia cell line. Nature. 1982; 298(5875):679-81. DOI: 10.1038/298679a0. View

5.
Albano F, Anelli L, Zagaria A, Coccaro N, DAddabbo P, Liso V . Genomic segmental duplications on the basis of the t(9;22) rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia. Oncogene. 2010; 29(17):2509-16. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.524. View