» Articles » PMID: 16132893

SAPS 3--From Evaluation of the Patient to Evaluation of the Intensive Care Unit. Part 1: Objectives, Methods and Cohort Description

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2005 Sep 1
PMID 16132893
Citations 234
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved model for risk adjustment.

Design: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study.

Patients And Setting: A total of 19,577 patients consecutively admitted to 307 ICUs from 14 October to 15 December 2002.

Measurements And Results: Data were collected at ICU admission, on days 1, 2 and 3, and the last day of the ICU stay. Data included sociodemographics, chronic conditions, diagnostic information, physiological derangement at ICU admission, number and severity of organ dysfunctions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge. Data reliability was tested with use of kappa statistics and intraclass-correlation coefficients, which were >0.85 for the majority of variables. Completeness of the data was also satisfactory, with 1 [0-3] SAPS II parameter missing per patient. Prognostic performance of the SAPS II was poor, with significant differences between observed and expected mortality rates for the overall cohort and four (of seven) defined regions, and poor calibration for most tested subgroups.

Conclusions: The SAPS 3 study was able to provide a high-quality multinational database, reflecting heterogeneity of current ICU case-mix and typology. The poor performance of SAPS II in this cohort underscores the need for development of a new risk adjustment system for critically ill patients.

Citing Articles

Impact of mechanical ventilation on severe acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 - a multicentre propensity matched analysis.

Perschinka F, Mayerhofer T, Engelbrecht T, Graf A, Zajic P, Metnitz P Ann Intensive Care. 2025; 15(1):17.

PMID: 39862353 PMC: 11762028. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01424-4.


Exploring the impact of age on the predictive power of the National Early Warning score (NEWS) 2, and long-term prognosis among patients reviewed by a Rapid Response Team: A prospective, multi-centre study.

Thoren A, Andersson Franko M, Joelsson-Alm E, Rawshani A, Kahan T, Engdahl J Resusc Plus. 2025; 21():100839.

PMID: 39811470 PMC: 11732060. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100839.


Urinary Output as a Predictor of Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: An Explorative Retrospective Analysis.

Markart S, Hermann A, Chiari F, Heinz G, Speidl W, Lenz M J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768629 PMC: 11677915. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247706.


Influence of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapies on the hemodynamic parameters of mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial.

Ghazaly H, Aly A, Tammam A, Hassan M, Hammad S, Mahmoud N BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):469.

PMID: 39707209 PMC: 11660434. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02838-6.


Efficacy and safety of a non-immersive virtual reality-based neuropsychological intervention for cognitive stimulation and relaxation in patients with critical illness: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (RGS-ICU).

Godoy-Gonzalez M, Lopez-Aguilar J, Fernandez-Gonzalo S, Goma G, Blanch L, Brandi S BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):917.

PMID: 39696098 PMC: 11654385. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06360-4.


References
1.
Rivera-Fernandez R, Vazquez-Mata G, Bravo M, Zimmerman J, Wagner D, Knaus W . The Apache III prognostic system: customized mortality predictions for Spanish ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 1998; 24(6):574-81. DOI: 10.1007/s001340050618. View

2.
Vincent J . Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27(8):1626-33. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00042. View

3.
Bastos P, Sun X, Wagner D, Knaus W, Zimmerman J . Application of the APACHE III prognostic system in Brazilian intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22(6):564-70. DOI: 10.1007/BF01708097. View

4.
Fagon J, Chastre J, Novara A, Medioni P, Gibert C . Characterization of intensive care unit patients using a model based on the presence or absence of organ dysfunctions and/or infection: the ODIN model. Intensive Care Med. 1993; 19(3):137-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF01720528. View

5.
Moreno R, Miranda D, Fidler V, Van Schilfgaarde R . Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26(1):50-61. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016. View