» Articles » PMID: 22933529

Object Position and Image Magnification in Dental Panoramic Radiography: a Theoretical Analysis

Overview
Date 2012 Aug 31
PMID 22933529
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of our study was to investigate how image magnification and distortion in dental panoramic radiography are influenced by object size and position for a small round object such as a ball bearing used for calibration.

Methods: Two ball bearings (2.5 mm and 6 mm in diameter) were placed at approximately the same position between the teeth of a plastic skull and radiographed 21 times. The skull was replaced each time. Their images were measured by software using edge detection and ellipse-fitting algorithms. Using a standard definition of magnification, equations were derived to enable an object's magnification to be determined from its position and vice versa knowing the diameter and machine parameters.

Results: The average magnification of the 2.5 mm ball bearing was 1.292 (0.0445) horizontally and 1.257 (0.0067) vertically with a mean ratio of 1.028 (0.0322); standard deviations are in parentheses. The figures for the 6 mm ball bearing were 1.286 (0.0068), 1.255 (0.0018) and 1.025 (0.0061), respectively. Derived positions of each ball bearing from magnification were more consistent horizontally than vertically. There was less variation in either direction for the 6 mm ball bearing than the 2.5 mm one.

Conclusions: Automatic measurement of image size resulted in less variation in vertical magnification values than horizontal. There are only certain positions in the focal trough that achieve zero distortion. Object location can be determined from its diameter, measured magnification and machine parameters. The 6 mm diameter ball bearing is preferable to the 2.5 mm one for more reliable magnification measurement and position determination.

Citing Articles

Impacted mandibular third molars: a comparison of orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography imaging in predicting surgical difficulty.

Mubarak H, Tajrin A, Gazali M, Nurwahida , Rahman F Arch Craniofac Surg. 2024; 25(5):217-223.

PMID: 39501730 PMC: 11540487. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2024.00297.


CBCT vs panoramic radiography in assessment of impacted upper canine and root resorption of the adjacent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peralta-Mamani M, Rubira C, Lopez-Lopez J, Honorio H, Rubira-Bullen I J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(2):e198-e222.

PMID: 38496811 PMC: 10943682. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61285.


Influence of the Tube Angle on the Measurement Accuracy of Peri-Implant Bone Defects in Rectangular Intraoral X-ray Imaging.

Rugani P, Weingartner K, Jakse N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256525 PMC: 10817073. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020391.


Accuracy of Anatomical Depictions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Reconstructed Panoramic Projections Compared to Conventional Panoramic Radiographs: A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis.

Jadhav A, Desai N, Tadinada A Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e44723.

PMID: 37809250 PMC: 10552931. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44723.


Determining the reliability of diagnosis and treatment using artificial intelligence software with panoramic radiographs.

Orhan K, Aktuna Belgin C, Manulis D, Golitsyna M, Bayrak S, Aksoy S Imaging Sci Dent. 2023; 53(3):199-208.

PMID: 37799743 PMC: 10548159. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20230109.


References
1.
Welander U . A mathematical model of narrow beam rotation methods. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1974; 15(3):305-17. DOI: 10.1177/028418517401500309. View

2.
Sakakura C, Morais J, Loffredo L, Scaf G . A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 32(6):397-400. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/20681066. View

3.
Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid W, MORRIS C . Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. IV. Object morphology; outer contours. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1981; 22(6):689-96. DOI: 10.1177/028418518102200613. View

4.
Rushton V, Horner K, Worthington H . The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J. 1999; 186(12):630-3. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800182. View

5.
Ladeira D, da Cruz A, Maria de Almeida S, Boscolo F . Evaluation of the panoramic image formation in different anatomic positions. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21(5):458-62. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000500014. View