» Articles » PMID: 21435009

Reliability of the Vertical Magnification Factor on Panoramic Radiographs: Clinical Implications for Posterior Mandibular Implants

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Mar 26
PMID 21435009
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Panoramic radiographs allow evaluation of the available bone height for implant treatment planning while imparting a low radiation dose. As panoramic radiography produces image distortion, reference objects are required to determine the exact magnification. This study aims to estimate a panoramic unit's vertical magnification factor (MF) by measuring the length of dental implants used as radiopaque reference objects on postoperative panoramic radiographs. We compared our findings to the vertical MF listed by the panoramic unit manufacturer, and studied the reproducibility and accuracy of our measuring method by analyzing the inter- and intraobserver agreements.

Material And Methods: Using a digital calliper, we measured the length of 32 implants on 17 postoperative panoramic radiographs taken with a Scanora unit. The implants were 10mm-long standard Straumann implants placed in the posterior segments of mandibles. The MF was calculated by dividing the implant's radiological length by the implant's real length.

Results: The mean calculated vertical MF was 1.27 ± 0.01 (1.245-1.295) and was lower than the manufacturer's MF (1.3). The vertical MF was 1.28 ± 0.01 in the premolar and 1.27 ± 0.01 in the molar regions. There was an excellent intraobserver reliability (0.96 for observer 1; 0.93 for observer 2) and a good interobserver reliability (0.85 at measurement session 1; 0.8 at measurement session 2)

Conclusions: The observed reliability of the MF confirms that a panoramic radiograph can be used for preoperative implant length evaluation in the posterior mandibular segments. MF stability should be verified with other panoramic units. In clinical practice, using the implant length as a reference object on postoperative panoramic radiographs is a simple and effective evaluation method to estimate a panoramic unit's MF.

Citing Articles

Incidence of Neurosensory Disturbance and Success Rates of Solid-Screw Implants Placed in Conjunction with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Transposition.

Al-Almaie S, Kavarodi A, Al Faidhi A, Alorf A, Alzahrani S Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 10(1):80-87.

PMID: 32855920 PMC: 7433969. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_160_19.


Influence of image-viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone-beam computed tomography: an study.

Vazquez L, Srinivasan M, Khouja F, Combescure C, Carrel J Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018; 2(1):44-50.

PMID: 29744148 PMC: 5839189. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.18.


The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study.

Bilhan H, Geckili O, Arat Bilhan S, Aycicek F, Albayrak B, Bozbulut P J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017; 49(1):1-9.

PMID: 28955519 PMC: 5573457. DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.55134.


Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment.

Kayal R J Orthod Sci. 2016; 5(4):117-120.

PMID: 27843885 PMC: 5084472. DOI: 10.4103/2278-0203.192113.


Impact of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy.

El Hage M, Bernard J, Combescure C, Vazquez L Int J Dent. 2015; 2015:452413.

PMID: 26557851 PMC: 4629037. DOI: 10.1155/2015/452413.