Hussaini S, Glogauer M, Sheikh Z, Al-Waeli H
Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(7).
PMID: 39056983
PMC: 11276053.
DOI: 10.3390/dj12070196.
Timme M, Bender J, Steffens L, Shay D, Schmeling A
Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(11).
PMID: 37998002
PMC: 10669860.
DOI: 10.3390/biology12111403.
Madiraju G, Mahabob N, Bello S
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 13(Suppl 2):S1717-S1722.
PMID: 35018062
PMC: 8686935.
DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_356_21.
Yeom H, Kim J, Huh K, Yi W, Heo M, Lee S
BMC Med Imaging. 2020; 20(1):68.
PMID: 32560631
PMC: 7304185.
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00472-5.
Rodriguez-Peinado N, Dieguez-Perez M, Saavedra-Marban G, Mourelle-Martinez M
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018; 10(8):e768-e771.
PMID: 30305874
PMC: 6174011.
DOI: 10.4317/jced.54915.
Automatic analysis algorithm for acquiring standard dental and mandibular shape data using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hwang J, Han S, Lee C, Jung Y
Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):13516.
PMID: 30202001
PMC: 6131388.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31869-6.
Evaluation of styloid process morphology and calcification types in both genders with different ages and dental status.
Magat G, Ozcan S
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017; 51(2):29-36.
PMID: 28955593
PMC: 5573471.
DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.35768.
The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study.
Bilhan H, Geckili O, Arat Bilhan S, Aycicek F, Albayrak B, Bozbulut P
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017; 49(1):1-9.
PMID: 28955519
PMC: 5573457.
DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.55134.
Comparison of Mesiodistal Root Angulation Measured from Conventional and CBCT Derived Panoramic Radiographs in Orthodontic Patients.
Nasseh I, Jensen D, Noujeim M
Open Dent J. 2017; 11:338-349.
PMID: 28839482
PMC: 5543660.
DOI: 10.2174/1874210601711010338.
The evaluation of MCI, MI, PMI and GT on both genders with different age and dental status.
Bozdag G, Sener S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44(9):20140435.
PMID: 26133366
PMC: 5083898.
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140435.
Accuracy of computerized vertical measurements on digital orthopantomographs: posterior mandibular region.
Assaf M, Gharbyah A
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015; 4(Suppl 2):7.
PMID: 25806135
PMC: 4286816.
DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.148274.
Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C, Rosenblatt M, Major P, Carey J, Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015; 19(5):45-53.
PMID: 25715716
PMC: 4296663.
DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar.
KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines.
Dalessandri D, Migliorati M, Visconti L, Contardo L, Kau C, Martin C
Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:537620.
PMID: 25126566
PMC: 4119896.
DOI: 10.1155/2014/537620.
Comparison of the reproducibility of panoramic radiographs between dentulous and edentulous patients.
Park J, Huh K, Yi W, Heo M, Lee S, Choi S
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014; 44(2):95-102.
PMID: 24944958
PMC: 4061305.
DOI: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.2.95.
Prognosis and evaluation of tooth damage caused by implant fixtures.
Yoon W, Kim S, Jeong M, Oh J, You J
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 39(3):144-7.
PMID: 24471033
PMC: 3858169.
DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.3.144.
Evaluation of the accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at different positions.
Nikneshan S, Sharafi M, Emadi N
Imaging Sci Dent. 2013; 43(3):191-6.
PMID: 24083213
PMC: 3784679.
DOI: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.3.191.
Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(2):20110429.
PMID: 23360688
PMC: 3699017.
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20110429.
Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis.
Devlin H, Yuan J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 42(1):29951683.
PMID: 22933529
PMC: 3729190.
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/29951683.
An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P, Galiti D, Huang Y, Dreesen K, Schreurs M, Souza P
Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 17(1):293-300.
PMID: 22382448
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0698-0.
Reliability of computational measurement of the condyles on digital panoramic radiographs.
Momjian A, Courvoisier D, Kiliaridis S, Scolozzi P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40(7):444-50.
PMID: 21960403
PMC: 3528145.
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/83507370.
