» Articles » PMID: 22848453

Functional Anatomy of the Masking Level Difference, an FMRI Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Aug 1
PMID 22848453
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Masking level differences (MLDs) are differences in the hearing threshold for the detection of a signal presented in a noise background, where either the phase of the signal or noise is reversed between ears. We use N0/Nπ to denote noise presented in-phase/out-of-phase between ears and S0/Sπ to denote a 500 Hz sine wave signal as in/out-of-phase. Signal detection level for the noise/signal combinations N0Sπ and NπS0 is typically 10-20 dB better than for N0S0. All combinations have the same spectrum, level, and duration of both the signal and the noise.

Methods: Ten participants (5 female), age: 22-43, with N0Sπ-N0S0 MLDs greater than 10 dB, were imaged using a sparse BOLD fMRI sequence, with a 9 second gap (1 second quiet preceding stimuli). Band-pass (400-600 Hz) noise and an enveloped signal (.25 second tone burst, 50% duty-cycle) were used to create the stimuli. Brain maps of statistically significant regions were formed from a second-level analysis using SPM5.

Results: The contrast NπS0- N0Sπ had significant regions of activation in the right pulvinar, corpus callosum, and insula bilaterally. The left inferior frontal gyrus had significant activation for contrasts N0Sπ-N0S0 and NπS0-N0S0. The contrast N0S0-N0Sπ revealed a region in the right insula, and the contrast N0S0-NπS0 had a region of significance in the left insula.

Conclusion: Our results extend the view that the thalamus acts as a gating mechanism to enable dichotic listening, and suggest that MLD processing is accomplished through thalamic communication with the insula, which communicate across the corpus callosum to either enhance or diminish the binaural signal (depending on the MLD condition). The audibility improvement of the signal with both MLD conditions is likely reflected by activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus, a late stage in the what/where model of auditory processing.

Citing Articles

Masking level differences under two different measurement conditions: A normative study of young adults.

Cekic S, Mujdeci B, Karakoc K, Bas B Brain Behav. 2024; 14(9):e370011.

PMID: 39295079 PMC: 11410869. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70011.


Age-Related Deficits in Binaural Hearing: Contribution of Peripheral and Central Effects.

Tolnai S, Weiss M, Beutelmann R, Bankstahl J, Bovee S, Ross T J Neurosci. 2024; 44(16).

PMID: 38395618 PMC: 11026345. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0963-22.2024.


Inferring the basis of binaural detection with a modified autoencoder.

Smith S, Sollini J, Akeroyd M Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1000079.

PMID: 36777633 PMC: 9909603. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1000079.


Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Zhou X, Sobczak G, McKay C, Litovsky R PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0267588.

PMID: 35468160 PMC: 9037936. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267588.


Supra-threshold perception and neural representation of tones presented in noise in conditions of masking release.

Egger K, Dau T, Epp B PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0222804.

PMID: 31600238 PMC: 6786607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222804.


References
1.
Fitch R, Miller S, Tallal P . Neurobiology of speech perception. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997; 20:331-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.331. View

2.
Sawusch J, Jusczyk P . Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981; 7(2):408-21. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.2.408. View

3.
Lipschutz B, Kolinsky R, Damhaut P, Wikler D, Goldman S . Attention-dependent changes of activation and connectivity in dichotic listening. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):643-56. View

4.
Thomsen T, Rimol L, Ersland L, Hugdahl K . Dichotic listening reveals functional specificity in prefrontal cortex: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2004; 21(1):211-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.039. View

5.
Maeder P, Meuli R, Adriani M, Bellmann A, Fornari E, Thiran J . Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: a human fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(4):802-16. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0888. View