» Articles » PMID: 35468160

Effects of Degraded Speech Processing and Binaural Unmasking Investigated Using Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS)

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Apr 25
PMID 35468160
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of degraded speech perception and binaural unmasking using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Normal hearing listeners were tested when attending to unprocessed or vocoded speech, presented to the left ear at two speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Additionally, by comparing monaural versus diotic masker noise, we measured binaural unmasking. Our primary research question was whether the prefrontal cortex and temporal cortex responded differently to varying listening configurations. Our a priori regions of interest (ROIs) were located at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and auditory cortex (AC). The left DLPFC has been reported to be involved in attentional processes when listening to degraded speech and in spatial hearing processing, while the AC has been reported to be sensitive to speech intelligibility. Comparisons of cortical activity between these two ROIs revealed significantly different fNIRS response patterns. Further, we showed a significant and positive correlation between self-reported task difficulty levels and fNIRS responses in the DLPFC, with a negative but non-significant correlation for the left AC, suggesting that the two ROIs played different roles in effortful speech perception. Our secondary question was whether activity within three sub-regions of the lateral PFC (LPFC) including the DLPFC was differentially affected by varying speech-noise configurations. We found significant effects of spectral degradation and SNR, and significant differences in fNIRS response amplitudes between the three regions, but no significant interaction between ROI and speech type, or between ROI and SNR. When attending to speech with monaural and diotic noises, participants reported the latter conditions being easier; however, no significant main effect of masker condition on cortical activity was observed. For cortical responses in the LPFC, a significant interaction between SNR and masker condition was observed. These findings suggest that binaural unmasking affects cortical activity through improving speech reception threshold in noise, rather than by reducing effort exerted.

Citing Articles

Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Sobczak G, Zhou X, Moore L, Bolt D, Litovsky R PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0307158.

PMID: 39292701 PMC: 11410267. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307158.


Intracranial electrophysiology of spectrally degraded speech in the human cortex.

Nourski K, Steinschneider M, Rhone A, Berger J, Dappen E, Kawasaki H Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1334742.

PMID: 38318272 PMC: 10839784. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1334742.


Side-of-Implantation Effect on Functional Asymmetry in the Auditory Cortex of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear-Implant Users.

Weglage A, Muller V, Layer N, Abdel-Latif K, Lang-Roth R, Walger M Brain Topogr. 2022; 35(4):431-452.

PMID: 35668310 PMC: 9334411. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-022-00902-3.

References
1.
Molavi B, Dumont G . Wavelet based motion artifact removal for Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010:5-8. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626589. View

2.
Barbey A, Koenigs M, Grafman J . Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex. 2012; 49(5):1195-205. PMC: 3495093. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022. View

3.
Toga A, Thompson P . Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(1):37-48. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1009. View

4.
Zekveld A, Kramer S, Festen J . Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear Hear. 2010; 31(4):480-90. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251. View

5.
Gilbert H, Shackleton T, Krumbholz K, Palmer A . The neural substrate for binaural masking level differences in the auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(1):209-20. PMC: 4287143. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1131-14.2015. View