» Articles » PMID: 22824475

A Critical Assessment of SELDI-TOF-MS for Biomarker Discovery in Serum and Tissue of Patients with an Ovarian Mass

Overview
Journal Proteome Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Jul 25
PMID 22824475
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Less than 25% of patients with a pelvic mass who are presented to a gynecologist will eventually be diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer. Since there is no reliable test to differentiate between different ovarian tumors, accurate classification could facilitate adequate referral to a gynecological oncologist, improving survival. The goal of our study was to assess the potential value of a SELDI-TOF-MS based classifier for discriminating between patients with a pelvic mass.

Methods: Our study design included a well-defined patient population, stringent protocols and an independent validation cohort. We compared serum samples of 53 ovarian cancer patients, 18 patients with tumors of low malignant potential, and 57 patients with a benign ovarian tumor on different ProteinChip arrays. In addition, from a subset of 84 patients, tumor tissues were collected and microdissection was used to isolate a pure and homogenous cell population.

Results: Diagonal Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification on serum samples comparing cancer versus benign tumors, yielded models with a classification accuracy of 71-81% (cross-validation), and 73-81% on the independent validation set. Cancer and benign tissues could be classified with 95-99% accuracy using cross-validation. Tumors of low malignant potential showed protein expression patterns different from both benign and cancer tissues. Remarkably, none of the peaks differentially expressed in serum samples were found to be differentially expressed in the tissue lysates of those same groups.

Conclusion: Although SELDI-TOF-MS can produce reliable classification results in serum samples of ovarian cancer patients, it will not be applicable in routine patient care. On the other hand, protein profiling of microdissected tumor tissue may lead to a better understanding of oncogenesis and could still be a source of new serum biomarkers leading to novel methods for differentiating between different histological subtypes.

Citing Articles

Advances in Detection of Kidney Transplant Injury.

Herath S, Erlich J, Au A, Endre Z Mol Diagn Ther. 2019; 23(3):333-351.

PMID: 30941671 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-019-00396-z.


Complementarity of Matrix- and Nanostructure-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Approaches.

Pomastowski P, Buszewski B Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019; 9(2).

PMID: 30769830 PMC: 6410089. DOI: 10.3390/nano9020260.


Elevation of glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B in type 1 Gaucher disease patients and mouse models.

Kramer G, Wegdam W, Donker-Koopman W, Ottenhoff R, Gaspar P, Verhoek M FEBS Open Bio. 2016; 6(9):902-13.

PMID: 27642553 PMC: 5011488. DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12078.


Proteomic study of benign and malignant pleural effusion.

Li H, Tang Z, Zhu H, Ge H, Cui S, Jiang W J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016; 142(6):1191-200.

PMID: 26945985 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2130-7.


Construction of protein profile classification model and screening of proteomic signature of acute leukemia.

Xu Y, Zhuo J, Duan Y, Shi B, Chen X, Zhang X Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014; 7(9):5569-81.

PMID: 25337199 PMC: 4203170.


References
1.
Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, Ryan A, Burnell M, Sharma A . Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(4):327-40. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70026-9. View

2.
Ye B, Cramer D, Skates S, Gygi S, Pratomo V, Fu L . Haptoglobin-alpha subunit as potential serum biomarker in ovarian cancer: identification and characterization using proteomic profiling and mass spectrometry. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9(8):2904-11. View

3.
Simpkins F, Czechowicz J, Liotta L, Kohn E . SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry for cancer biomarker discovery and serum proteomic diagnostics. Pharmacogenomics. 2005; 6(6):647-53. DOI: 10.2217/14622416.6.6.647. View

4.
Skates S, Horick N, Yu Y, Xu F, Berchuck A, Havrilesky L . Preoperative sensitivity and specificity for early-stage ovarian cancer when combining cancer antigen CA-125II, CA 15-3, CA 72-4, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor using mixtures of multivariate normal distributions. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(20):4059-66. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.091. View

5.
Petricoin E, Ardekani A, Hitt B, Levine P, Fusaro V, Steinberg S . Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2002; 359(9306):572-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07746-2. View