» Articles » PMID: 7835809

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Ovarian Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 1994 Dec 1
PMID 7835809
Citations 34
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Ovarian Cancer-Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up brought together epidemiologists; obstetrician/gynecologists; gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncologists; and the public to address the following questions: (1) What is the current status of screening and prevention in ovarian cancer? (2) What is the appropriate management of early-stage ovarian cancer? (3) What is the appropriate management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer? (4) What is the appropriate follow-up after primary therapy? and (5) What are the directions for future research? The consensus panel concluded that there is no evidence available as yet that the current screening modalities of CA 125 and transvaginal ultrasonography can be effectively used for widespread screening to reduce mortality from ovarian cancer nor that their use will result in decreased rather than increased morbidity and mortality. They recommended that further prospective research be done to evaluate this very important issue. Women with stage IA grade 1 and most IB grade 1 ovarian cancer do not require postoperative adjuvant therapy. Many remaining stage I patients do require chemotherapy. Subsets of stage I must be fully defined and ideal treatment must be determined. Women with stages II, III, and IV epithelial ovarian cancer (other than low malignant potential tumors) should receive postoperative chemotherapy. Physicians should be encouraged to discuss clinical trial participation with women, and women should be encouraged to participate. All women should have access to accurate and complete information regarding ovarian cancer. Furthermore, there must be no barriers to women's access to qualified specialists, optimal therapy, and protocols. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Frequency and Characteristics of Unexpected Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Women Who Have Undergone Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Masses - A Review of Five Years.

Pegu B, Sri Saranya T, Subburaj S, Murugesan R Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e42872.

PMID: 37664369 PMC: 10474307. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42872.


Targeting Tyrosine Kinases in Ovarian Cancer: Small Molecule Inhibitor and Monoclonal Antibody, Where Are We Now?.

Rendell A, Thomas-Bland I, McCuish L, Taylor C, Binju M, Yu Y Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36140214 PMC: 9495728. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092113.


SPME-LC/MS-based serum metabolomic phenotyping for distinguishing ovarian cancer histologic subtypes: a pilot study.

Olkowicz M, Rosales-Solano H, Kulasingam V, Pawliszyn J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22428.

PMID: 34789766 PMC: 8599860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00802-9.


Colon carcinoma presenting as ovarian metastasis.

Kemps P, Bol M, Steller E, de Pont L, Holterhues C, van Gerven L Radiol Case Rep. 2021; 16(9):2799-2803.

PMID: 34367398 PMC: 8326593. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.06.072.


Is There a Role of Elevated CA 19-9 Levels in the Evaluation of Clinical Characteristics of Mature Cystic Ovarian Teratomas? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Prodromidou A, Pandraklakis A, Loutradis D, Haidopoulos D Cureus. 2020; 11(12):e6342.

PMID: 31938630 PMC: 6952044. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6342.