» Articles » PMID: 22792171

Chaotic Motifs in Gene Regulatory Networks

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jul 14
PMID 22792171
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chaos should occur often in gene regulatory networks (GRNs) which have been widely described by nonlinear coupled ordinary differential equations, if their dimensions are no less than 3. It is therefore puzzling that chaos has never been reported in GRNs in nature and is also extremely rare in models of GRNs. On the other hand, the topic of motifs has attracted great attention in studying biological networks, and network motifs are suggested to be elementary building blocks that carry out some key functions in the network. In this paper, chaotic motifs (subnetworks with chaos) in GRNs are systematically investigated. The conclusion is that: (i) chaos can only appear through competitions between different oscillatory modes with rivaling intensities. Conditions required for chaotic GRNs are found to be very strict, which make chaotic GRNs extremely rare. (ii) Chaotic motifs are explored as the simplest few-node structures capable of producing chaos, and serve as the intrinsic source of chaos of random few-node GRNs. Several optimal motifs causing chaos with atypically high probability are figured out. (iii) Moreover, we discovered that a number of special oscillators can never produce chaos. These structures bring some advantages on rhythmic functions and may help us understand the robustness of diverse biological rhythms. (iv) The methods of dominant phase-advanced driving (DPAD) and DPAD time fraction are proposed to quantitatively identify chaotic motifs and to explain the origin of chaotic behaviors in GRNs.

Citing Articles

Breaking reflection symmetry: evolving long dynamical cycles in Boolean systems.

Ouellet M, Kim J, Guillaume H, Shaffer S, Bassett L, Bassett D New J Phys. 2024; 26(2):023006.

PMID: 38327877 PMC: 10845163. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ad1bdd.


Chaos in a bacterial stress response.

Choudhary D, Foster K, Uphoff S Curr Biol. 2023; 33(24):5404-5414.e9.

PMID: 38029757 PMC: 7616676. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.11.002.


Impact of Negative Feedbacks on De Novo Pyrimidines Biosynthesis in .

Akberdin I, Kozlov K, Kazantsev F, Fadeev S, Likhoshvai V, Khlebodarova T Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36902235 PMC: 10003070. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054806.


Developing an Embedding, Koopman and Autoencoder Technologies-Based Multi-Omics Time Series Predictive Model (EKATP) for Systems Biology research.

Liu S, You Y, Tong Z, Zhang L Front Genet. 2021; 12:761629.

PMID: 34764986 PMC: 8576451. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.761629.


Nonlinear delay differential equations and their application to modeling biological network motifs.

Glass D, Jin X, Riedel-Kruse I Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):1788.

PMID: 33741909 PMC: 7979834. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21700-8.


References
1.
Goldbeter A . Computational approaches to cellular rhythms. Nature. 2002; 420(6912):238-45. DOI: 10.1038/nature01259. View

2.
Suguna C, Chowdhury K, Sinha S . Minimal model for complex dynamics in cellular processes. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 2002; 60(5 Pt B):5943-9. DOI: 10.1103/physreve.60.5943. View

3.
Leloup J, Goldbeter A . A model for circadian rhythms in Drosophila incorporating the formation of a complex between the PER and TIM proteins. J Biol Rhythms. 1998; 13(1):70-87. DOI: 10.1177/074873098128999934. View

4.
Elowitz M, Leibler S . A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000; 403(6767):335-8. DOI: 10.1038/35002125. View

5.
Sporns O, Kotter R . Motifs in brain networks. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(11):e369. PMC: 524253. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020369. View