» Articles » PMID: 31059715

Oscillations in Well-mixed, Deterministic Feedback Systems: Beyond Ring Oscillators

Overview
Journal J Theor Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 May 7
PMID 31059715
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A ring oscillator is a system in which one species regulates the next, which regulates the next and so on until the last species regulates the first. In addition, the number of the regulations which are negative, and so result in a reduction in the regulated species, is odd, making the overall feedback in the loop negative. In ring oscillators, the probability of oscillations is maximised if the degradation rates of the species are equal. When there is more than one loop in the regulatory network, the dynamics can be more complicated. Here, a systematic way of organising the characteristic equation of ODE models of regulatory networks is provided. This facilitates the identification of Hopf bifurcations. It is shown that the probability of oscillations in non-ring systems is maximised for unequal degradation rates. For example, when there is a ring and a second ring employing a subset of the genes in the first ring, then the probability of oscillations is maximised when the species in the sub-ring degrade more slowly than those outside, for a negative feedback subring. When the sub-ring forms a positive feedback loop, the optimal degradation rates are larger for the species in the sub-ring, provided the positive feedback is not too strong. By contrast, optimal degradation rates are smaller for the species in the sub-ring, when the positive feedback is very strong. Adding a positive feedback loop to a repressilator increases the probability of oscillations, provided the positive feedback is not too strong, whereas adding a negative feedback loop decreases the probability of oscillations. The work is illustrated with numerical simulations of example systems: an autoregulatory gene model in which transcription is downregulated by the protein dimer and three-species and four-species gene regulatory network examples.

Citing Articles

Multi-stability in cellular differentiation enabled by a network of three mutually repressing master regulators.

Duddu A, Sahoo S, Hati S, Jhunjhunwala S, Jolly M J R Soc Interface. 2020; 17(170):20200631.

PMID: 32993428 PMC: 7536062. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0631.

References
1.
Reddy A, Rey G . Metabolic and nontranscriptional circadian clocks: eukaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014; 83:165-89. PMC: 4768355. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035623. View

2.
Zhang Z, Ye W, Qian Y, Zheng Z, Huang X, Hu G . Chaotic motifs in gene regulatory networks. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e39355. PMC: 3391214. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039355. View

3.
Panovska-Griffiths J, Page K, Briscoe J . A gene regulatory motif that generates oscillatory or multiway switch outputs. J R Soc Interface. 2012; 10(79):20120826. PMC: 3565701. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0826. View

4.
de Jong H . Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol. 2002; 9(1):67-103. DOI: 10.1089/10665270252833208. View

5.
Maya R, Segel L, Alon U, Levine A, Oren M . Generation of oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop: a theoretical and experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(21):11250-5. PMC: 17186. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.210171597. View