» Articles » PMID: 22760558

Discrepancy Between the Atwater Factor Predicted and Empirically Measured Energy Values of Almonds in Human Diets

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2012 Jul 5
PMID 22760558
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The energy content of foods is primarily determined by the Atwater factors, which may not be accurate for certain food groups. Nuts are a food group for which substantial evidence suggests that the Atwater factors may be poorly predictive.

Objective: A study was conducted to determine the energy value of almonds in the human diet and to compare the measured energy value with the value calculated from the Atwater factors.

Design: Eighteen healthy adults consumed a controlled diet or an almond-containing diet for 18 d. Three treatments were administered to subjects in a crossover design, and diets contained 1 of 3 almond doses: 0, 42, or 84 g/d. During the final 9 d of the treatment period, volunteers collected all urine and feces, and samples of diets, feces, and urine were analyzed for macronutrient and energy contents. The metabolizable energy content of the almonds was determined.

Results: The energy content of almonds in the human diet was found to be 4.6 ± 0.8 kcal/g, which is equivalent to 129 kcal/28-g serving. This is significantly less than the energy density of 6.0-6.1 kcal/g as determined by the Atwater factors, which is equivalent to an energy content of 168-170 kcal/serving. The Atwater factors, when applied to almonds, resulted in a 32% overestimation of their measured energy content.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the inaccuracies of the Atwater factors for certain applications and provides a rigorous method for determining empirically the energy value of individual foods within the context of a mixed diet. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01007188.

Citing Articles

Perspective: Current Scientific Evidence and Research Strategies in the Role of Almonds in Cardiometabolic Health.

Trumbo P, Ard J, Bellisle F, Drewnowski A, Gilbert J, Kleinman R Curr Dev Nutr. 2025; 9(1):104516.

PMID: 39896730 PMC: 11786730. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104516.


Decoding the Foodome: Molecular Networks Connecting Diet and Health.

Menichetti G, Barabasi A, Loscalzo J Annu Rev Nutr. 2024; 44(1):257-288.

PMID: 39207880 PMC: 11610447. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-062322-030557.


A Cross-Sectional Study on the Association of Walnut Consumption with Obesity and Relative Fat Mass among United States Adolescents and Young Adults in NHANES (2003-2020).

Gletsu-Miller N, Henschel B, Tekwe C, Thiagarajah K Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(8):104407.

PMID: 39157012 PMC: 11324821. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104407.


Digesting the complex metabolic effects of diet on the host and microbiome.

Carmody R, Varady K, Turnbaugh P Cell. 2024; 187(15):3857-3876.

PMID: 39059362 PMC: 11309583. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.032.


A Randomized, Crossover Trial Assessing Appetite, Energy Metabolism, Blood Biomarkers, and Ad Libitum Food Intake Responses to a Mid-Morning Pecan Snack vs. an Equicaloric High-Carbohydrate Snack in Healthy Volunteers with Overweight/Obesity.

Peters J, Breen J, Pan Z, Nicklas J, Cornier M Nutrients. 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 38999832 PMC: 11243619. DOI: 10.3390/nu16132084.


References
1.
Brown J, Livesey G, Roe M, Faulks R, Poppitt S, Wilkinson J . Metabolizable energy of high non-starch polysaccharide-maintenance and weight-reducing diets in men: experimental appraisal of assessment systems. J Nutr. 1998; 128(6):986-95. DOI: 10.1093/jn/128.6.986. View

2.
Traoret C, Lokko P, Cruz A, Oliveira C, Costa N, Bressan J . Peanut digestion and energy balance. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007; 32(2):322-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803735. View

3.
Wien M, Sabate J, Ikle D, Cole S, Kandeel F . Almonds vs complex carbohydrates in a weight reduction program. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27(11):1365-72. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802411. View

4.
Hu F, Stampfer M, Manson J, Rimm E, Colditz G, Rosner B . Frequent nut consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1998; 317(7169):1341-5. PMC: 28714. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1341. View

5.
Livesey G . Energy values of unavailable carbohydrate and diets: an inquiry and analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 51(4):617-37. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.4.617. View