Speech Intelligibility and Prosody Production in Children with Cochlear Implants

Overview

Journal J Commun Disord

Specialty Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2012 Jun 22

PMID 22717120

Citations 15

Authors

Steven B Chin

Tonya R Bergeson

Jennifer Phan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the current study was to examine the relation between speech intelligibility and prosody production in children who use cochlear implants.

Methods: The Beginner's Intelligibility Test (BIT) and Prosodic Utterance Production (PUP) task were administered to 15 children who use cochlear implants and 10 children with normal hearing. Adult listeners with normal hearing judged the intelligibility of the words in the BIT sentences, identified the PUP sentences as one of four grammatical or emotional moods (i.e., declarative, interrogative, happy, or sad), and rated the PUP sentences according to how well they thought the child conveyed the designated mood.

Results: Percent correct scores were higher for intelligibility than for prosody and higher for children with normal hearing than for children with cochlear implants. Declarative sentences were most readily identified and received the highest ratings by adult listeners; interrogative sentences were least readily identified and received the lowest ratings. Correlations between intelligibility and all mood identification and rating scores except declarative were not significant.

Discussion: The findings suggest that the development of speech intelligibility progresses ahead of prosody in both children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing; however, children with normal hearing still perform better than children with cochlear implants on measures of intelligibility and prosody even after accounting for hearing age. Problems with interrogative intonation may be related to more general restrictions on rising intonation, and the correlation results indicate that intelligibility and sentence intonation may be relatively dissociated at these ages.

Learning Outcomes: As a result of this activity, readers will be able to describe (1) methods for measuring speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing, (2) the differences between children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants on measures of speech intelligibility and prosody production, and (3) the relations between speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing.

Citing Articles

Everything, altogether, all at once: Addressing data challenges when measuring speech intelligibility through entropy scores.

Espejo J, De Maeyer S, Gillis S Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(7):8132-8154.

PMID: 39048860 PMC: 11362487. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02457-6.

Prosodic Development During the Early School-Age Years.

Kallay J, Dilley L, Redford M J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022; 65(11):4025-4046.

PMID: 36260352 PMC: 9940891. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00124.

Effects of mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and signal amplification on vocal emotion recognition in middle-aged-older individuals.

Ekberg M, Andin J, Stenfelt S, Dahlstrom O PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0261354.

PMID: 34995305 PMC: 8740977. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261354.

Vocal imitation between mothers and their children with cochlear implants.

Kondaurova M, Fagan M, Zheng Q Infancy. 2020; 25(6):827-850.

PMID: 32799404 PMC: 9594862. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12363.

How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers.

Damm S, Sis J, Kulkarni A, Chatterjee M J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(10):3728-3740.

PMID: 31589545 PMC: 7201339. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0497.

References

Snow D . Children's imitations of intonation contours: are rising tones more difficult than falling tones?. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41(3):576-87. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4103.576. View

Lenden J, Flipsen Jr P . Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord. 2006; 40(1):66-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.04.004. View

Vongpaisal T, Trehub S, Schellenberg E . Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49(5):1091-103. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/078). View

Mehler J, Jusczyk P, Lambertz G, Halsted N, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C . A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition. 1988; 29(2):143-78. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90035-2. View

Jusczyk P, Hirsh-Pasek K, NELSON D, Kennedy L, Woodward A, Piwoz J . Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cogn Psychol. 1992; 24(2):252-93. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-q. View

Thiessen E, Saffran J . When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Dev Psychol. 2003; 39(4):706-16. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.706. View

Peng S, Tomblin J, Spencer L, Hurtig R . Imitative production of rising speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50(5):1210-27. PMC: 3212410. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/085). View

Forner L, HIXON T . Respiratory kinematics in profoundly hearing-impaired speakers. J Speech Hear Res. 1977; 20(2):373-408. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2002.373. View

Tobey E, Hasenstab S . Effects of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children. Ear Hear. 1991; 12(4 Suppl):48S-54S. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199108001-00007. View

10.

Snow D . Phrase-final syllable lengthening and intonation in early child speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37(4):831-40. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3704.831. View

11.

de Bodt M, Van de Heyning P . Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. J Commun Disord. 2002; 35(3):283-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(02)00065-5. View

12.

Hirsh-Pasek K, Kemler Nelson D, Jusczyk P, Cassidy K, Druss B, Kennedy L . Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition. 1987; 26(3):269-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(87)80002-1. View

13.

Loeb D, Allen G . Preschoolers' imitation of intonation contours. J Speech Hear Res. 1993; 36(1):4-13. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3601.04. View

14.

McGarr N, Osberger N . Pitch deviancy and intelligibility of deaf speech. J Commun Disord. 1978; 11(2-3):237-47. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(78)90016-3. View

15.

Monsen R . Durational aspects of vowel production in the speech of deaf children. J Speech Hear Res. 1974; 17(3):386-98. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1703.386. View

16.

Carter A, Dillon C, Pisoni D . Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: suprasegmental analyses. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003; 16(8):619-38. PMC: 3435887. DOI: 10.1080/02699200021000034958. View

17.

Osberger M, Miyamoto R, Kemink J, Stroer B, Firszt J, Novak M . Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 1991; 12(4 Suppl):66S-80S. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199108001-00009. View

18.

Klein H . Learning to stress: a case study. J Child Lang. 1984; 11(2):375-90. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900005821. View

19.

Gathercole S, Willis C, Baddeley A, Emslie H . The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition: a test of phonological working memory. Memory. 1994; 2(2):103-27. DOI: 10.1080/09658219408258940. View

20.

Peng S, Tomblin J, Turner C . Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2008; 29(3):336-51. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318168d94d. View