» Articles » PMID: 17905907

Imitative Production of Rising Speech Intonation in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients

Overview
Date 2007 Oct 2
PMID 17905907
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the acoustic characteristics of pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients' imitative production of rising speech intonation, in relation to the perceptual judgments by listeners with normal hearing (NH).

Method: Recordings of a yes-no interrogative utterance imitated by 24 prelingually deafened children with a CI were extracted from annual evaluation sessions. These utterances were perceptually judged by adult NH listeners in regard with intonation contour type (non-rise, partial-rise, or full-rise) and contour appropriateness (on a 5-point scale). Fundamental frequency, intensity, and duration properties of each utterance were also acoustically analyzed.

Results: Adult NH listeners' judgments of intonation contour type and contour appropriateness for each CI participant's utterances were highly positively correlated. The pediatric CI recipients did not consistently use appropriate intonation contours when imitating a yes-no question. Acoustic properties of speech intonation produced by these individuals were discernible among utterances of different intonation contour types according to NH listeners' perceptual judgments.

Conclusions: These findings delineated the perceptual and acoustic characteristics of speech intonation imitated by prelingually deafened children and young adults with a CI. Future studies should address whether the degraded signals these individuals perceive via a CI contribute to their difficulties with speech intonation production.

Citing Articles

Vocal imitation between mothers and their children with cochlear implants.

Kondaurova M, Fagan M, Zheng Q Infancy. 2020; 25(6):827-850.

PMID: 32799404 PMC: 9594862. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12363.


How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers.

Damm S, Sis J, Kulkarni A, Chatterjee M J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(10):3728-3740.

PMID: 31589545 PMC: 7201339. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0497.


The Production of Question Intonation by Young Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Does Age at Implantation Matter?.

Lehnert-LeHouillier H, Spencer L, Machmer E, Burchell K J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(2):257-271.

PMID: 30950697 PMC: 6436888. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0468.


Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Jiam N, Caldwell M, Deroche M, Chatterjee M, Limb C Hear Res. 2017; 352:30-39.

PMID: 28088500 PMC: 5937709. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.006.


The Music Experiences and Attitudes Of A First Cohort of Prelingually-Deaf Adolescents and Young Adults CI Recipients.

Gfeller K, Driscoll V, Smith R, Scheperle C Semin Hear. 2013; 33(4):346-360.

PMID: 23565029 PMC: 3616443. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329224.


References
1.
Snow D . Children's imitations of intonation contours: are rising tones more difficult than falling tones?. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41(3):576-87. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4103.576. View

2.
Osberger M, Miyamoto R, Kemink J, Stroer B, Firszt J, Novak M . Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 1991; 12(4 Suppl):66S-80S. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199108001-00009. View

3.
Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S . Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116(4 Pt 1):2298-310. DOI: 10.1121/1.1785611. View

4.
Faulkner A, Rosen S, Smith C . Effects of the salience of pitch and periodicity information on the intelligibility of four-channel vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 108(4):1877-87. DOI: 10.1121/1.1310667. View

5.
Furrow D . Young children's use of prosody. J Child Lang. 1984; 11(1):203-13. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900005663. View