» Articles » PMID: 22705496

The Abundance of Rad51 Protein in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells is Regulated at Multiple Levels

Overview
Journal Stem Cell Res
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2012 Jun 19
PMID 22705496
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in embryonic stem (ES) cells are repaired primarily by homologous recombination (HR). The mechanism by which HR is regulated in these cells, however, remains enigmatic. To gain insight into such regulatory mechanisms, we have asked how protein levels of Rad51, a key component of HR, are controlled in mouse ES cells and mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs). The Rad51 protein level is about 15-fold higher in ES cells than in MEFs. The level of Rad51 mRNA, however, is only ~2-fold higher, indicating that the differences in mRNA levels due to rates of transcription or mRNA stability are not sufficient to account for the large difference in the abundance of Rad51 protein. Comparison of Rad51 half-lives between ES cells and MEFs also did not explain the elevated level of Rad51 protein in the ES cells. A comparative assessment of the Rad51 translation level demonstrated that it is translated with much greater efficacy in ES cells than in MEFs. To determine whether this high level of translation in ES cells is a general phenomenon in these cells or whether it is a characteristic of specific proteins, such as those involved with recombination and cell cycle progression, we compared mechanisms that regulate the level of Pcna in ES cells with those that regulate Rad51. The half-life of Pcna and its rate of synthesis were considerably different from those of Rad51 in ES cells, demonstrating that regulation of Rad51 abundance cannot be generalized to other ES cell proteins and not to proteins involved in DNA replication and cell cycle control. Finally, we show that only a small proportion of the abundant Rad51 protein population is activated under basal conditions in ES cells and recruited to DNA DSBs and/or stalled replication forks.

Citing Articles

ZNF212 promotes genomic integrity through direct interaction with TRAIP.

Chung H, Lee J, Kim T, Kim S, Park K, Kim M Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(2):631-649.

PMID: 36594163 PMC: 9881131. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1226.


Budding yeast Rad51: a paradigm for how phosphorylation and intrinsic structural disorder regulate homologous recombination and protein homeostasis.

Woo T, Chuang C, Wang T Curr Genet. 2021; 67(3):389-396.

PMID: 33433732 PMC: 8139929. DOI: 10.1007/s00294-020-01151-2.


Wnts and the hallmarks of cancer.

Zhong Z, Yu J, Virshup D, Madan B Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020; 39(3):625-645.

PMID: 32385713 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09887-6.


Reprogramming and differentiation-dependent transcriptional alteration of DNA damage response and apoptosis genes in human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Shimada M, Tsukada K, Kagawa N, Matsumoto Y J Radiat Res. 2019; 60(6):719-728.

PMID: 31665364 PMC: 7357234. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz057.


Precise in vivo genome editing via single homology arm donor mediated intron-targeting gene integration for genetic disease correction.

Suzuki K, Yamamoto M, Hernandez-Benitez R, Li Z, Wei C, Soligalla R Cell Res. 2019; 29(10):804-819.

PMID: 31444470 PMC: 6796851. DOI: 10.1038/s41422-019-0213-0.


References
1.
Bracken A, Ciro M, Cocito A, Helin K . E2F target genes: unraveling the biology. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004; 29(8):409-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.06.006. View

2.
Yamamoto A, Taki T, Yagi H, HABU T, Yoshida K, Yoshimura Y . Cell cycle-dependent expression of the mouse Rad51 gene in proliferating cells. Mol Gen Genet. 1996; 251(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF02174338. View

3.
Jain S, FILIPE M, Hall P, Waseem N, Lane D, Levison D . Prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in gastric carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 1991; 44(8):655-9. PMC: 496758. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.44.8.655. View

4.
Mangham D, Rowlands D, Newbold K, Reynolds G, FIELDING J, Hallissey M . Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in gastric carcinoma: no evidence for prognostic value. J Clin Pathol. 1994; 47(5):473-4. PMC: 502033. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.5.473. View

5.
Lu R, Markowetz F, Unwin R, Leek J, Airoldi E, MacArthur B . Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2009; 462(7271):358-62. PMC: 3199216. DOI: 10.1038/nature08575. View