» Articles » PMID: 22678957

Aerosol Bolus Dispersion in Acinar Airways--influence of Gravity and Airway Asymmetry

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 9
PMID 22678957
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aerosol bolus technique can be used to estimate the degree of convective mixing in the lung; however, contributions of different lung compartments to measured dispersion cannot be differentiated unambiguously. To estimate dispersion in the distal lung, we studied the effect of gravity and airway asymmetry on the dispersion of 1 μm-diameter particle boluses in three-dimensional computational models of the lung periphery, ranging from a single alveolar sac to four-generation (g4) structures of bifurcating airways that deformed homogeneously during breathing. Boluses were introduced at the beginning of a 2-s inhalation, immediately followed by a 3-s exhalation. Dispersion was estimated by the half-width of the exhaled bolus. Dispersion was significantly affected by the spatial orientation of the models in normal gravity and was less in zero gravity than in normal gravity. Dispersion was strongly correlated with model volume in both normal and zero gravity. Predicted pulmonary dispersion based on a symmetric g4 acinar model was 391 ml and 238 ml under normal and zero gravity, respectively. These results accounted for a significant amount of dispersion measured experimentally. In zero gravity, predicted dispersion in a highly asymmetric model accounted for ∼20% of that obtained in a symmetric model with comparable volume and number of alveolated branches, whereas normal gravity dispersions were comparable in both models. These results suggest that gravitational sedimentation and not geometrical asymmetry is the dominant factor in aerosol dispersion in the lung periphery.

Citing Articles

Exploring the role of electrostatic deposition on inhaled aerosols in alveolated microchannels.

Bessler R, Bhardwaj S, Malka D, Fishler R, Sznitman J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):23069.

PMID: 38155187 PMC: 10754925. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49946-w.


Automated bidirectional coupling of multiscale models of aerosol dosimetry: validation with subject-specific deposition data.

Kuprat A, Price O, Asgharian B, Singh R, Colby S, Yugulis K J Aerosol Sci. 2023; 174.

PMID: 37637507 PMC: 10448711. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106233.


Fluid-structure interaction analysis of airflow, structural mechanics and aerosol dynamics in a four-generation acinar model.

Li P, Guo W, Fan J, Su C, Zhao X, Xu X J Aerosol Sci. 2023; 171:106166.

PMID: 36938546 PMC: 10010053. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106166.


Influence of alveolar mixing and multiple breaths of aerosol intake on particle deposition in the human lungs.

Asgharian B, Price O, Borojeni A, Kuprat A, Colby S, Singh R J Aerosol Sci. 2022; 166.

PMID: 36405567 PMC: 9671400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106050.


Recent advances in the understanding of alveolar flow.

Dong J, Yang Y, Zhu Y Biomicrofluidics. 2022; 16(2):021502.

PMID: 35464135 PMC: 9010052. DOI: 10.1063/5.0084415.


References
1.
Tsuda A, Henry F, Butler J . Chaotic mixing of alveolated duct flow in rhythmically expanding pulmonary acinus. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995; 79(3):1055-63. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.3.1055. View

2.
Scherer P, Shendalman L, Greene N, Bouhuys A . Measurement of axial diffusivities in a model of the bronchial airways. J Appl Physiol. 1975; 38(4):719-23. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1975.38.4.719. View

3.
Darquenne C, Prisk G . Deposition of inhaled particles in the human lung is more peripheral in lunar than in normal gravity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008; 103(6):687-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0766-y. View

4.
van Ertbruggen C, Corieri P, Theunissen R, Riethmuller M, Darquenne C . Validation of CFD predictions of flow in a 3D alveolated bend with experimental data. J Biomech. 2007; 41(2):399-405. PMC: 2290742. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.08.013. View

5.
Brown J, Gerrity T, Bennett W, Kim C, House D . Dispersion of aerosol boluses in the human lung: dependence on lung volume, bolus volume, and gender. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995; 79(5):1787-95. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.5.1787. View