» Articles » PMID: 22662060

Contrast Agent-free Sonoporation: The Use of an Ultrasonic Standing Wave Microfluidic System for the Delivery of Pharmaceutical Agents

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 5
PMID 22662060
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sonoporation is a useful biophysical mechanism for facilitating the transmembrane delivery of therapeutic agents from the extracellular to the intracellular milieu. Conventionally, sonoporation is carried out in the presence of ultrasound contrast agents, which are known to greatly enhance transient poration of biological cell membranes. However, in vivo contrast agents have been observed to induce capillary rupture and haemorrhage due to endothelial cell damage and to greatly increase the potential for cell lysis in vitro. Here, we demonstrate sonoporation of cardiac myoblasts in the absence of contrast agent (CA-free sonoporation) using a low-cost ultrasound-microfluidic device. Within this device an ultrasonic standing wave was generated, allowing control over the position of the cells and the strength of the acoustic radiation forces. Real-time single-cell analysis and retrospective post-sonication analysis of insonated cardiac myoblasts showed that CA-free sonoporation induced transmembrane transfer of fluorescent probes (CMFDA and FITC-dextran) and that different mechanisms potentially contribute to membrane poration in the presence of an ultrasonic wave. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, we have shown for the first time that sonoporation induces increased cell cytotoxicity as a consequence of CA-free ultrasound-facilitated uptake of pharmaceutical agents (doxorubicin, luteolin, and apigenin). The US-microfluidic device designed here provides an in vitro alternative to expensive and controversial in vivo models used for early stage drug discovery, and drug delivery programs and toxicity measurements.

Citing Articles

Acoustothermal transfection for cell therapy.

Liu X, Rong N, Tian Z, Rich J, Niu L, Li P Sci Adv. 2024; 10(16):eadk1855.

PMID: 38630814 PMC: 11023511. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk1855.


Basic Principles of RNA Interference: Nucleic Acid Types and In Vitro Intracellular Delivery Methods.

Isenmann M, Stoddart M, Schmelzeisen R, Gross C, Della Bella E, Rothweiler R Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(7).

PMID: 37512632 PMC: 10383872. DOI: 10.3390/mi14071321.


The role of acoustofluidics and microbubble dynamics for therapeutic applications and drug delivery.

Kaykanat S, Uguz A Biomicrofluidics. 2023; 17(2):021502.

PMID: 37153864 PMC: 10162024. DOI: 10.1063/5.0130769.


Landscape of Cellular Bioeffects Triggered by Ultrasound-Induced Sonoporation.

Przystupski D, Ussowicz M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(19).

PMID: 36232532 PMC: 9569453. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911222.


Delivering the CRISPR/Cas9 system for engineering gene therapies: Recent cargo and delivery approaches for clinical translation.

Foley R, Sims R, Duggan E, Olmedo J, Ma R, Jonas S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:973326.

PMID: 36225598 PMC: 9549251. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.973326.


References
1.
Wang H, Lu C . Electroporation of mammalian cells in a microfluidic channel with geometric variation. Anal Chem. 2006; 78(14):5158-64. DOI: 10.1021/ac060733n. View

2.
Zordoky B, El-Kadi A . Induction of several cytochrome P450 genes by doxorubicin in H9c2 cells. Vascul Pharmacol. 2008; 49(4-6):166-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2008.07.004. View

3.
Hammarstrom B, Evander M, Barbeau H, Bruzelius M, Larsson J, Laurell T . Non-contact acoustic cell trapping in disposable glass capillaries. Lab Chip. 2010; 10(17):2251-7. DOI: 10.1039/c004504g. View

4.
Zhang X, Yin H, Cooper J, Haswell S . A microfluidic-based system for analysis of single cells based on Ca2+ flux. Electrophoresis. 2006; 27(24):5093-100. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200600390. View

5.
Noori A, Selvaganapathy P, Wilson J . Microinjection in a microfluidic format using flexible and compliant channels and electroosmotic dosage control. Lab Chip. 2009; 9(22):3202-11. DOI: 10.1039/b909961a. View