» Articles » PMID: 37153864

The Role of Acoustofluidics and Microbubble Dynamics for Therapeutic Applications and Drug Delivery

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Targeted drug delivery is proposed to reduce the toxic effects of conventional therapeutic methods. For that purpose, nanoparticles are loaded with drugs called nanocarriers and directed toward a specific site. However, biological barriers challenge the nanocarriers to convey the drug to the target site effectively. Different targeting strategies and nanoparticle designs are used to overcome these barriers. Ultrasound is a new, safe, and non-invasive drug targeting method, especially when combined with microbubbles. Microbubbles oscillate under the effect of the ultrasound, which increases the permeability of endothelium, hence, the drug uptake to the target site. Consequently, this new technique reduces the dose of the drug and avoids its side effects. This review aims to describe the biological barriers and the targeting types with the critical features of acoustically driven microbubbles focusing on biomedical applications. The theoretical part covers the historical developments in microbubble models for different conditions: microbubbles in an incompressible and compressible medium and bubbles encapsulated by a shell. The current state and the possible future directions are discussed.

Citing Articles

Nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery in the vascular system: focus on endothelium.

Cong X, Zhang Z, Li H, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Sun T J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):620.

PMID: 39396002 PMC: 11470712. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02892-9.

References
1.
Alexiou C, Arnold W, Klein R, Parak F, Hulin P, Bergemann C . Locoregional cancer treatment with magnetic drug targeting. Cancer Res. 2000; 60(23):6641-8. View

2.
Miller C, Bondurant B, McLean S, McGovern K, OBrien D . Liposome-cell interactions in vitro: effect of liposome surface charge on the binding and endocytosis of conventional and sterically stabilized liposomes. Biochemistry. 1998; 37(37):12875-83. DOI: 10.1021/bi980096y. View

3.
Chapelon J, Margonari J, Vernier F, Gorry F, Ecochard R, Gelet A . In vivo effects of high-intensity ultrasound on prostatic adenocarcinoma Dunning R3327. Cancer Res. 1992; 52(22):6353-7. View

4.
Vaezy S, Martin R, Schmiedl U, Caps M, Taylor S, Beach K . Liver hemostasis using high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997; 23(9):1413-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00143-9. View

5.
de Jong N, Hoff L . Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. Ultrasonics. 1993; 31(3):175-81. DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(93)90004-j. View