» Articles » PMID: 22300930

Low Kilovoltage CT of the Neck with 70 KVp: Comparison with a Standard Protocol

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Feb 4
PMID 22300930
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: CT protocols should aim for radiation doses being as low as reasonably achievable. The purpose of our study was to assess the image quality and radiation dose of neck CT at a tube potential of 70 kVp.

Materials And Methods: Twenty patients (7 female, mean age 51.4 years, age range 19-81 years) underwent contrast-enhanced 64-section CT of the neck at 70 kVp (ATCM, effective tube current-time product 614 eff.mAs, range 467-713 eff.mAs). All 20 patients had a previous neck CT at 120 kVp on the same scanner. Two radiologists assessed image quality and artifacts in the upper, middle, and lower neck. Image noise and attenuation were measured, and the CNR was calculated. Effective radiation dose was calculated.

Results: Interobserver agreement regarding image quality of soft tissue for 70-kVp and 120-kVp scans was good to excellent. At 70 kVp, soft tissues were of diagnostic image quality in all scans, whereas the lower cervical spine was not of diagnostic quality in 3 and 4 scans per both readers. No difference was found among 70-kVp and 120-kVp scans for soft tissue image quality in the upper neck, while image quality was significantly better in the middle at 70 kVp (P < .05) and better in the lower third at 120 kVp (P < .05). CNR was significantly higher at 70 kVp in all levels for both readers (P < .001). Effective radiation dose at 70 kVp was significantly lower (0.88 ± 0.2 mSv) than at 120 kVp (1.33 ± 0.2 mSv, P < .001).

Conclusions: CT of the cervical soft tissues at 70 kVp is feasible, provides diagnostic image quality with improved CNR, and reduces radiation dose by approximately 34% compared with a standard protocol at 120 kVp. In contrast, low kVp CT of the lower cervical spine suffers from compromised image quality.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Image Quality of Neck Structures Scanned on Chest CT with Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media.

Kim J, Kim J, Oh S, Kim H Tomography. 2022; 8(6):2854-2863.

PMID: 36548531 PMC: 9785131. DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060239.


Multi-factorial considerations for intra-thoracic lymph node evaluations of healthy cats on computed tomographic images.

Thammasiri N, Thanaboonnipat C, Choisunirachon N, Darawiroj D BMC Vet Res. 2021; 17(1):59.

PMID: 33509167 PMC: 7844987. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-021-02771-7.


Optimization of HU threshold for coronary artery calcium scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using iterative reconstruction.

Hou K, Tsujioka K, Yang C J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(2):111-120.

PMID: 31889419 PMC: 7021007. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12806.


Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures.

Sollmann N, Mei K, Hedderich D, Maegerlein C, Kopp F, Loffler M Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(7):3606-3616.

PMID: 30903337 PMC: 6554251. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2.


Filtered back projection revisited in low-kilovolt computed tomography angiography: sharp filter kernel enhances visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz.

Nishii T, Kotoku A, Hori Y, Matsuzaki Y, Watanabe Y, Morita Y Neuroradiology. 2018; 61(3):305-311.

PMID: 30465057 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-018-2136-8.


References
1.
Amis Jr E, Butler P . ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: three years later. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7(11):865-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.04.006. View

2.
Shrout P, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86(2):420-8. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. View

3.
Mulkens T, Marchal P, Daineffe S, Salgado R, Bellinck P, te Rijdt B . Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(8):1444-50. PMC: 8134402. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0608. View

4.
Weidemann J, Stamm G, Galanski M, Keberle M . Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated protocols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE Lightspeed scanner. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 69(3):473-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.027. View

5.
Namasivayam S, Kalra M, Pottala K, Waldrop S, Hudgins P . Optimization of Z-axis automatic exposure control for multidetector row CT evaluation of neck and comparison with fixed tube current technique for image quality and radiation dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(10):2221-5. PMC: 7977215. View