» Articles » PMID: 22523529

ENCODING AND DECODING V1 FMRI RESPONSES TO NATURAL IMAGES WITH SPARSE NONPARAMETRIC MODELS

Overview
Journal Ann Appl Stat
Date 2012 Apr 24
PMID 22523529
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) has become the most common method for investigating the human brain. However, fMRI data present some complications for statistical analysis and modeling. One recently developed approach to these data focuses on estimation of computational encoding models that describe how stimuli are transformed into brain activity measured in individual voxels. Here we aim at building encoding models for fMRI signals recorded in the primary visual cortex of the human brain. We use residual analyses to reveal systematic nonlinearity across voxels not taken into account by previous models. We then show how a sparse nonparametric method [bJ. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B71 (2009b) 1009-1030] can be used together with correlation screening to estimate nonlinear encoding models effectively. Our approach produces encoding models that predict about 25% more accurately than models estimated using other methods [Nature452 (2008a) 352-355]. The estimated nonlinearity impacts the inferred properties of individual voxels, and it has a plausible biological interpretation. One benefit of quantitative encoding models is that estimated models can be used to decode brain activity, in order to identify which specific image was seen by an observer. Encoding models estimated by our approach also improve such image identification by about 12% when the correct image is one of 11,500 possible images.

Citing Articles

Stacked regressions and structured variance partitioning for interpretable brain maps.

Lin R, Naselaris T, Kay K, Wehbe L bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37163111 PMC: 10168225. DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.23.537988.


Evaluating increases in sensitivity from NORDIC for diverse fMRI acquisition strategies.

Dowdle L, Vizioli L, Moeller S, Akcakaya M, Olman C, Ghose G Neuroimage. 2023; 270:119949.

PMID: 36804422 PMC: 10234612. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119949.


On the encoding of natural music in computational models and human brains.

Kim S Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:928841.

PMID: 36203808 PMC: 9531138. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.928841.


GaborNet Visual Encoding: A Lightweight Region-Based Visual Encoding Model With Good Expressiveness and Biological Interpretability.

Cui Y, Qiao K, Zhang C, Wang L, Yan B, Tong L Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:614182.

PMID: 33613179 PMC: 7893978. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.614182.


Superheat: An R package for creating beautiful and extendable heatmaps for visualizing complex data.

Barter R, Yu B J Comput Graph Stat. 2019; 27(4):910-922.

PMID: 30911216 PMC: 6430237. DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2018.1473780.


References
1.
Buxton R, Uludag K, Dubowitz D, Liu T . Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage. 2004; 23 Suppl 1:S220-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.013. View

2.
Raizada R, Tsao F, Liu H, Kuhl P . Quantifying the adequacy of neural representations for a cross-language phonetic discrimination task: prediction of individual differences. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(1):1-12. PMC: 2860710. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp076. View

3.
Olman C, Ugurbil K, Schrater P, Kersten D . BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images. Vision Res. 2004; 44(7):669-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.022. View

4.
Rakic P . A small step for the cell, a giant leap for mankind: a hypothesis of neocortical expansion during evolution. Trends Neurosci. 1995; 18(9):383-8. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93934-p. View

5.
Buxton R, Wong E, Frank L . Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 39(6):855-64. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390602. View