» Articles » PMID: 19710310

Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Aug 28
PMID 19710310
Citations 152
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human subjects are extremely efficient at categorizing natural scenes, despite the fact that different classes of natural scenes often share similar image statistics. Thus far, however, it is unknown where and how complex natural scene categories are encoded and discriminated in the brain. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and distributed pattern analysis to ask what regions of the brain can differentiate natural scene categories (such as forests vs mountains vs beaches). Using completely different exemplars of six natural scene categories for training and testing ensured that the classification algorithm was learning patterns associated with the category in general and not specific exemplars. We found that area V1, the parahippocampal place area (PPA), retrosplenial cortex (RSC), and lateral occipital complex (LOC) all contain information that distinguishes among natural scene categories. More importantly, correlations with human behavioral experiments suggest that the information present in the PPA, RSC, and LOC is likely to contribute to natural scene categorization by humans. Specifically, error patterns of predictions based on fMRI signals in these areas were significantly correlated with the behavioral errors of the subjects. Furthermore, both behavioral categorization performance and predictions from PPA exhibited a significant decrease in accuracy when scenes were presented up-down inverted. Together these results suggest that a network of regions, including the PPA, RSC, and LOC, contribute to the human ability to categorize natural scenes.

Citing Articles

Spatial frequency preferences of representations of indoor and natural scene categories in scene-selective regions under different conditions of contrast.

Zhang Y, Miao Q, Liu B Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1534588.

PMID: 39991751 PMC: 11842314. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1534588.


Distinct mechanisms for panoramic and landmark-based view integration in human scene-selective cortex.

Han L, Epstein R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896651 PMC: 11785239. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.24.634774.


Retinotopy drives the variation in scene responses across visual field map divisions of the occipital place area.

Scrivener C, Zamboni E, Morland A, Silson E J Vis. 2024; 24(8):10.

PMID: 39167394 PMC: 11343012. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.8.10.


Predictive processing of scenes and objects.

Peelen M, Berlot E, de Lange F Nat Rev Psychol. 2024; 3:13-26.

PMID: 38989004 PMC: 7616164. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-023-00254-0.


Immersive scene representation in human visual cortex with ultra-wide-angle neuroimaging.

Park J, Soucy E, Segawa J, Mair R, Konkle T Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5477.

PMID: 38942766 PMC: 11213904. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49669-0.


References
1.
Li F, VanRullen R, Koch C, Perona P . Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(14):9596-601. PMC: 123186. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092277599. View

2.
Aguirre G . Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007; 35(4):1480-94. PMC: 2147064. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.005. View

3.
Epstein R, Parker W, Feiler A . Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(23):6141-9. PMC: 6672165. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0799-07.2007. View

4.
Tarr M, Gauthier I . FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(8):764-9. DOI: 10.1038/77666. View

5.
King-Smith P, Grigsby S, Vingrys A, Benes S, Supowit A . Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res. 1994; 34(7):885-912. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90039-6. View