» Articles » PMID: 28439532

Recruiting to Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials Through Registries

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 26
PMID 28439532
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Participant registries are repositories of individuals who have expressed willingness to learn about studies for which they may be eligible. Registries are increasingly being utilized to improve recruitment to preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials, which require large screening efforts to identify adequate numbers of participants who meet enrollment criteria. Recruiting to preclinical AD trials from registries is made more efficient through registry collection of data that permits exclusion of those who will not be eligible and identifies individuals most likely to qualify for trials. Such data could include self-reported disease family history or other risk factors, but could also include cognitive, genetic, or biomarker testing outcomes. Few data are available to guide investigators overseeing registries and important ethical questions are likely to arise related to their conduct, especially in registries collecting AD risk information. This article outlines three areas of consideration for registry investigators: informed consent, disclosure, and sponsorship.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of different recruitment strategies for the FINGER-NL multidomain lifestyle intervention trial via the Dutch Brain Research Registry.

Waterink L, Sikkes S, Soons L, Beers S, Meijer-Krommenhoek Y, van de Rest O Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025; 11(1):e70017.

PMID: 39790861 PMC: 11712179. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.70017.


Ethical issues in genomics research in persons with Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD): a systematic review.

Yakubu A, Adedeji I, Maduka O, Jegede A, Adebamowo C BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):138.

PMID: 39587628 PMC: 11587778. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01141-w.


Comparing research attitudes in Down syndrome and non-Down syndrome research decision-makers.

Lu T, Campos P, Leader S, Lee X, Xu H, Doran E Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024; 10(3):e12478.

PMID: 39086735 PMC: 11289724. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12478.


Subjective Cognitive Decline in a Registry Sample: Relation to Psychiatric History, Loneliness, and Personality.

Reynolds G, Manning L, Kirn D, Klein H, Hampton O, Burke Jr O J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022; 9(3):435-440.

PMID: 35841244 PMC: 8940594. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2022.31.


Diversifying Recruitment Registries: Considering Neighborhood Health Metrics.

Grill J, Kind A, Hoang D, Gillen D J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022; 9(1):119-125.

PMID: 35098982 PMC: 8903055. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2021.50.


References
1.
Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C . What makes clinical research ethical?. JAMA. 2000; 283(20):2701-11. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701. View

2.
Halpern S, Karlawish J, Berlin J . The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA. 2002; 288(3):358-62. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.3.358. View

3.
Green M, Peterson S, Baker M, Harper G, Friedman L, Rubinstein W . Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 292(4):442-52. PMC: 1237120. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.4.442. View

4.
Harris P, Lane L, Biaggioni I . Clinical research subject recruitment: the Volunteer for Vanderbilt Research Program www.volunteer.mc.vanderbilt.edu. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12(6):608-13. PMC: 1294031. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1722. View

5.
Wendler D, Pentz R . How does the collection of genetic test results affect research participants?. Am J Med Genet A. 2007; 143A(15):1733-8. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31823. View