» Articles » PMID: 22479327

Comparison of Bone and Renal Effects in HIV-infected Adults Switching to Abacavir or Tenofovir Based Therapy in a Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Apr 6
PMID 22479327
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to compare the bone and renal effects among HIV-infected patients randomized to abacavir or tenofovir-based combination anti-retroviral therapy.

Methods: In an open-label randomized trial, HIV-infected patients were randomized to switch from zidovudine/lamivudine (AZT/3TC) to abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). We measured bone mass density (BMD) and bone turnover biomarkers (osteocalcin, osteocalcin, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), alkaline phosphatase, type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTx), and osteoprotegerin). We assessed renal function by estimated creatinine clearance, plasma cystatin C, and urinary levels of creatinine, albumin, cystatin C, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). The changes from baseline in BMD and renal and bone biomarkers were compared across study arms.

Results: Of 40 included patients, 35 completed 48 weeks of randomized therapy and follow up. BMD was measured in 33, 26, and 27 patients at baseline, week 24, and week 48, respectively. In TDF/FTC-treated patients we observed significant reductions from baseline in hip and lumbar spine BMD at week 24 (-1.8% and -2.5%) and week 48 (-2.1% and -2.1%), whereas BMD was stable in patients in the ABC/3TC arm. The changes from baseline in BMD were significantly different between study arms. All bone turnover biomarkers except osteoprotegerin increased in the TDF/FTC arm compared with the ABC/3TC arm, but early changes did not predict subsequent loss of BMD. Renal function parameters were similar between study arms although a small increase in NGAL was detected among TDF-treated patients.

Conclusion: Switching to TDF/FTC-based therapy led to decreases in BMD and increases in bone turnover markers compared with ABC/3TC-based treatment. No major difference in renal function was observed.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00647244.

Citing Articles

The effect of anti-retroviral therapy on fracture healing : an in vivo animal model.

Graham S, Jalal M, Lalloo D, Simpson A Bone Joint Res. 2022; 11(8):585-593.

PMID: 35942801 PMC: 9396923. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.118.BJR-2021-0523.R2.


Bone outcomes in virally suppressed youth with HIV switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Braithwaite K, McPherson T, Shen Y, Arpadi S, Shiau S, Sorour G South Afr J HIV Med. 2021; 22(1):1243.

PMID: 34522425 PMC: 8424762. DOI: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1243.


Bone Deleterious Effects of Different NRTIs in Treatment-naïve HIV Patients After 12 and 48 Weeks of Treatment.

Atencio P, Conesa-Buendia F, Cabello-Ubeda A, Llamas-Granda P, Perez-Tanoira R, Prieto-Perez L Curr HIV Res. 2021; 19(5):434-447.

PMID: 34353266 PMC: 9175084. DOI: 10.2174/1570162X19666210805094434.


Vitamin D and Calcium Supplement Attenuate Bone Loss among HIVInfected Patients Receiving Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine/ Efavirenz: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Boontanondha P, Nimitphong H, Musikarat S, Ragkho A, Kiertiburanakul S Curr HIV Res. 2020; 18(1):52-62.

PMID: 31906840 PMC: 7516332. DOI: 10.2174/1570162X18666200106150806.


Alternative switching strategies based on regimens with a low genetic barrier: do clinicians have a choice nowadays?.

Troya J, Ryan P, Montejano R, Cabello A, Cuevas G, Matarranz M Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 38(3):423-426.

PMID: 30443683 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3429-x.


References
1.
Carr A, Hoy J . Low bone mineral density with tenofovir: does statistically significant mean clinically significant?. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 51(8):973-5. DOI: 10.1086/656418. View

2.
McComsey G, Kendall M, Tebas P, Swindells S, Hogg E, Alston-Smith B . Alendronate with calcium and vitamin D supplementation is safe and effective for the treatment of decreased bone mineral density in HIV. AIDS. 2007; 21(18):2473-82. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ef961d. View

3.
van Vonderen M, Lips P, van Agtmael M, Hassink E, Brinkman K, Geerlings S . First line zidovudine/lamivudine/lopinavir/ritonavir leads to greater bone loss compared to nevirapine/lopinavir/ritonavir. AIDS. 2009; 23(11):1367-76. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832c4947. View

4.
Mallon P . HIV and bone mineral density. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009; 23(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328334fe9a. View

5.
Bonjoch A, Bayes B, Riba J, Puig J, Estany C, Perez-Alvarez N . Validation of estimated renal function measurements compared with the isotopic glomerular filtration rate in an HIV-infected cohort. Antiviral Res. 2010; 88(3):347-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.09.015. View