» Articles » PMID: 22470122

Use of Carbapenems Against Clinical, Nontyphoid Salmonella Isolates: Results from in Vitro and in Vivo Animal Studies

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2012 Apr 4
PMID 22470122
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates has created the need for new therapeutic agents. We evaluated the intracellular activity of four carbapenem compounds against clinical nontyphoid Salmonella (NTS) isolates in vitro and ex vivo. Subsequently, the efficacy of carbapenem treatment against selected Salmonella isolates in vivo was assessed using a murine peritonitis model. The MIC(50) and MIC(90) for doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem against 126 NTS isolates were found to be 0.062 and 0.062, 0.015 and 0.015, 0.5 and 1, and 0.031 and 0.031 μg/ml, respectively. The intracellular killing effect of ertapenem was sustained for 24 h and was superior to that of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem; its effect was comparable to that of ceftriaxone. Ertapenem demonstrated an excellent pharmacokinetic profile with a percent time above the MIC of 75.5% and an area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio of 20,733. When peritoneal exudate cells were examined directly ex vivo from mice with Salmonella-induced peritonitis, cells from mice treated with ertapenem and ceftriaxone had intracellular and extracellular bacterial counts reduced 10(2)- to 10(4)-fold and exhibited killing effects similar to each other. The survival rates of mice inoculated with 1 × 10(5) and 10(6) CFU of a ceftriaxone-susceptible Salmonella isolate that were subsequently treated with ertapenem or ceftriaxone were 100% and 90%, respectively. When mice were inoculated with 5 × 10(4) and 10(5) CFU of a ceftriaxone-resistant and ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella isolate, mice treated with ertapenem had a higher survival rate than mice treated with ceftriaxone (70% versus 0% and 50% versus 0%, respectively; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that ertapenem is at least as effective as ceftriaxone in treating murine Salmonella infections and show that further clinical investigations on the potential use of ertapenem in treatment of human Salmonella infections are warranted.

Citing Articles

Organoid and Enteroid Modeling of Infection.

Yin Y, Zhou D Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018; 8:102.

PMID: 29670862 PMC: 5894114. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00102.

References
1.
Lee H, Su L, Tsai M, Kim S, Chang H, Jung S . High rate of reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone among nontyphoid Salmonella clinical isolates in Asia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(6):2696-9. PMC: 2687261. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01297-08. View

2.
Chiu L, Menhinick A, Johnson P, Amsden G . Pharmacokinetics of intravenous azithromycin and ceftriaxone when administered alone and concurrently to healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002; 50(6):1075-9. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg003. View

3.
Norrby S . Carbapenems. Med Clin North Am. 1995; 79(4):745-59. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30037-2. View

4.
Moczygemba L, Frei C, Burgess D . Pharmacodynamic modeling of carbapenems and fluoroquinolones against bacteria that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Clin Ther. 2005; 26(11):1800-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11.009. View

5.
Yan J, Ko W, Chiu C, Tsai S, Wu H, Wu J . Emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella isolates and rapid spread of plasmid-encoded CMY-2-like cephalosporinase, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9(3):323-8. PMC: 2958529. DOI: 10.3201/eid0903.010410. View