» Articles » PMID: 22357845

The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Feb 24
PMID 22357845
Citations 140
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence of category specificity from neuroimaging in the human visual system is generally limited to a few relatively coarse categorical distinctions-e.g., faces versus bodies, or animals versus artifacts-leaving unknown the neural underpinnings of fine-grained category structure within these large domains. Here we use fMRI to explore brain activity for a set of categories within the animate domain, including six animal species-two each from three very different biological classes: primates, birds, and insects. Patterns of activity throughout ventral object vision cortex reflected the biological classes of the stimuli. Specifically, the abstract representational space-measured as dissimilarity matrices defined between species-specific multivariate patterns of brain activity-correlated strongly with behavioral judgments of biological similarity of the same stimuli. This biological class structure was uncorrelated with structure measured in retinotopic visual cortex, which correlated instead with a dissimilarity matrix defined by a model of V1 cortex for the same stimuli. Additionally, analysis of the shape of the similarity space in ventral regions provides evidence for a continuum in the abstract representational space-with primates at one end and insects at the other. Further investigation into the cortical topography of activity that contributes to this category structure reveals the partial engagement of brain systems active normally for inanimate objects in addition to animate regions.

Citing Articles

Perceptual and semantic maps in individual humans share structural features that predict creative abilities.

Seiler J, Elpelt J, Ghobadi A, Kaschube M, Rumpel S Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):30.

PMID: 39994417 PMC: 11850602. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00214-9.


The brain prioritizes the basic level of object category abstraction.

Greene M, Rohan A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):31.

PMID: 39747114 PMC: 11695711. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80546-4.


Unsupervised method for representation transfer from one brain to another.

Nakamura D, Kaji S, Kanai R, Hayashi R Front Neuroinform. 2024; 18:1470845.

PMID: 39669979 PMC: 11634869. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1470845.


The Scope and Limits of Fine-Grained Image and Category Information in the Ventral Visual Pathway.

Badwal M, Bergmann J, Roth J, Roth J, Doeller C, Hebart M J Neurosci. 2024; 45(3.

PMID: 39505406 PMC: 11735656. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0936-24.2024.


Spatiotemporal hierarchies of face representation in the human ventral temporal cortex.

Salehi S, Dehaqani M, Schrouff J, Sava-Segal C, Raccah O, Baek S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26501.

PMID: 39489833 PMC: 11532485. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77895-5.


References
1.
Chao L, Weisberg J, Martin A . Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cereb Cortex. 2002; 12(5):545-51. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/12.5.545. View

2.
Reddy L, Kanwisher N . Category selectivity in the ventral visual pathway confers robustness to clutter and diverted attention. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(23):2067-72. PMC: 2744456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.043. View

3.
Hodges J, Graham N, Patterson K . Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. Memory. 1995; 3(3-4):463-95. DOI: 10.1080/09658219508253161. View

4.
Beauchamp M, Lee K, Haxby J, Martin A . FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003; 15(7):991-1001. DOI: 10.1162/089892903770007380. View

5.
Rakison D . Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychol Bull. 2001; 127(2):209-28. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209. View