» Articles » PMID: 22355308

Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Feb 23
PMID 22355308
Citations 267
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thirteen 71-channel human scalp EEG datasets by 22 ICA and BSS algorithms, assessing the pairwise mutual information (PMI) in scalp channel pairs, the remaining PMI in component pairs, the overall mutual information reduction (MIR) effected by each decomposition, and decomposition 'dipolarity' defined as the number of component scalp maps matching the projection of a single equivalent dipole with less than a given residual variance. The least well-performing algorithm was principal component analysis (PCA); best performing were AMICA and other likelihood/mutual information based ICA methods. Though these and other commonly-used decomposition methods returned many similar components, across 18 ICA/BSS algorithms mean dipolarity varied linearly with both MIR and with PMI remaining between the resulting component time courses, a result compatible with an interpretation of many maximally independent EEG components as being volume-conducted projections of partially-synchronous local cortical field activity within single compact cortical domains. To encourage further method comparisons, the data and software used to prepare the results have been made available (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/BSSComparison).

Citing Articles

How does Independent Component Analysis Preprocessing Affect EEG Microstates?.

Artoni F, Michel C Brain Topogr. 2025; 38(2):26.

PMID: 39904902 PMC: 11794336. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01098-4.


Neuronal oscillations and functional connectivity of paced nostril breathing: A high-density EEG study.

Frohlich A, Frohlich F, Sklerov M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316125.

PMID: 39899491 PMC: 11790152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316125.


Preprocessing choices for P3 analyses with mobile EEG: A systematic literature review and interactive exploration.

Jacobsen N, Kristanto D, Welp S, Inceler Y, Debener S Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14743.

PMID: 39697161 PMC: 11656290. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14743.


An Empirical Model-Based Algorithm for Removing Motion-Caused Artifacts in Motor Imagery EEG Data for Classification Using an Optimized CNN Model.

Megalingam R, Sankardas K, Manoharan S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686227 PMC: 11644907. DOI: 10.3390/s24237690.


Using cluster-based permutation tests to estimate MEG/EEG onsets: How bad is it?.

Rousselet G Eur J Neurosci. 2024; 61(1):e16618.

PMID: 39617724 PMC: 11670281. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16618.


References
1.
Makeig S, Debener S, Onton J, Delorme A . Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(5):204-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008. View

2.
Sarnthein J, Morel A, von Stein A, Jeanmonod D . Thalamocortical theta coherence in neurological patients at rest and during a working memory task. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005; 57(2):87-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.015. View

3.
Kang K, Shelley M, Henrie J, Shapley R . LFP spectral peaks in V1 cortex: network resonance and cortico-cortical feedback. J Comput Neurosci. 2009; 29(3):495-507. PMC: 3050555. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-009-0190-2. View

4.
Scherg M, Berg P . Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis. Brain Topogr. 1991; 4(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF01132771. View

5.
Stepanyants A, M Martinez L, Ferecsko A, Kisvarday Z . The fractions of short- and long-range connections in the visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(9):3555-60. PMC: 2651285. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810390106. View