» Articles » PMID: 38898069

Optimizing EEG ICA Decomposition with Data Cleaning in Stationary and Mobile Experiments

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38898069
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) studies increasingly utilize more mobile experimental protocols, leading to more and stronger artifacts in the recorded data. Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is commonly used to remove these artifacts. It is standard practice to remove artifactual samples before ICA to improve the decomposition, for example using automatic tools such as the sample rejection option of the AMICA algorithm. However, the effects of movement intensity and the strength of automatic sample rejection on ICA decomposition have not been systematically evaluated. We conducted AMICA decompositions on eight open-access datasets with varying degrees of motion intensity using varying sample rejection criteria. We evaluated decomposition quality using mutual information of the components, the proportion of brain, muscle, and 'other' components, residual variance, and an exemplary signal-to-noise ratio. Within individual studies, increased movement significantly decreased decomposition quality, though this effect was not found across different studies. Cleaning strength significantly improved the decomposition, but the effect was smaller than expected. Our results suggest that the AMICA algorithm is robust even with limited data cleaning. Moderate cleaning, such as 5 to 10 iterations of the AMICA sample rejection, is likely to improve the decomposition of most datasets, regardless of motion intensity.

Citing Articles

Preprocessing choices for P3 analyses with mobile EEG: A systematic literature review and interactive exploration.

Jacobsen N, Kristanto D, Welp S, Inceler Y, Debener S Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14743.

PMID: 39697161 PMC: 11656290. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14743.


Electrocortical activity during resistance exercises in healthy young adults-a systematic review.

Visser A, Piskin D, Buchel D, Baumeister J Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1466776.

PMID: 39664745 PMC: 11631587. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1466776.

References
1.
Bell A, Sejnowski T . An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995; 7(6):1129-59. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129. View

2.
Delorme A, Palmer J, Onton J, Oostenveld R, Makeig S . Independent EEG sources are dipolar. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e30135. PMC: 3280242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030135. View

3.
Klug M, Gramann K . Identifying key factors for improving ICA-based decomposition of EEG data in mobile and stationary experiments. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 54(12):8406-8420. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14992. View

4.
Gramann K, Hohlefeld F, Gehrke L, Klug M . Human cortical dynamics during full-body heading changes. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18186. PMC: 8440696. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97749-8. View

5.
Jacobsen N, Blum S, Witt K, Debener S . A walk in the park? Characterizing gait-related artifacts in mobile EEG recordings. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 54(12):8421-8440. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14965. View